首页> 外文期刊>International journal of information systems and social change >Cultural Determinants of Information Processing Shortcuts in Computer Supported Groups: A Review, Research Agenda and Instrument Validation
【24h】

Cultural Determinants of Information Processing Shortcuts in Computer Supported Groups: A Review, Research Agenda and Instrument Validation

机译:计算机支持群体中信息处理快捷方式的文化决定因素:综述,研究议程和仪器验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organizations are constantly engaged in actions. If an organization does not take actions, it cannot remain solvent, and if the organization consistently exercises poor judgment in the actions that it takes, it is destined to fail. Organizations do not have minds, and they do not make decisions, they are institutions that empower individual agents to make decisions on their behalf and empower other individuals to carry out the actions associated with these decisions. These decision making agents can be individuals or groups. The complex nature of organizational decisions creates information overload for individual agents, causing them to engage in a number of information processing shortcuts, which threaten the quality of their decisions. While groups can overcome some of the problems associated with information overload, they are prone to their own shortcomings related to communication and coordination. Decision Support Systems (DSS) and Group Support Systems (GSS) respectively have been employed in an attempt to overcome some of these shortcuts and shortcomings and studies have had mixed results but generally indicate that these technologies are effective (Chan & Limsuwan, 2012). However information processing researchers have not explored the potential moderators between a) information overload and information processing shortcuts or b) communication and coordination problems and group shortcomings. The study proposed in this paper is a first attempt at those ends: a) first we build hypotheses linking cultural factors to information processing shortcuts, both individual and group; b) then we outline a study to test these relationships; c) finally, we validate an instrument to test these hypotheses.
机译:组织不断参与行动。如果组织不采取行动,那么它就不能保持有偿付能力,并且如果组织对所采取的行动持续做出错误的判断,那么它注定会失败。组织没有头脑,也没有决策权,它们是赋予个人代理权以代表他们做决定并赋予其他人以执行与这些决定有关的行动的机构。这些决策者可以是个人或团体。组织决策的复杂性会给单个代理带来过多的信息,导致他们参与许多信息处理捷径,从而威胁到他们决策的质量。尽管小组可以克服一些与信息过载有关的问题,但他们也容易出现与沟通和协调有关的缺点。为了克服这些捷径和缺点,分别采用了决策支持系统(DSS)和小组支持系统(GSS),研究结果参差不齐,但总体上表明这些技术是有效的(Chan&Limsuwan,2012)。但是,信息处理研究人员尚未探索以下问题的潜在主持人:a)信息过载和信息处理捷径,或者b)沟通和协调问题以及小组缺点。本文提出的研究是为此目的的首次尝试:a)首先,我们建立将文化因素与个人和群体的信息处理捷径联系起来的假设; b)然后概述研究以测试这些关系; c)最后,我们验证一种检验这些假设的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号