...
【24h】

Device-funded vs ad-funded platforms

机译:设备资助的VS AD资助平台

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We analyze device-funded and ad-funded platforms with differentiated ecosystems supporting apps provided under monopolistic competition. The incentives of a device-funded platform in investing in app curation, introducing its own apps and setting commissions on in-app purchases of external apps are largely aligned with those of consumers, while this is not necessarily the case for the ad-funded platform. In particular, consumers gain from a positive commission set by the device-funded platform because this implies a lower price of the device, and the platform & rsquo;s apps are introduced and priced internalizing the impact on consumer welfare, perfectly in models of horizontal differentiation and partially in models of vertical differentiation.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
机译:我们分析了具有在垄断竞争下提供的应用程序的差异化生态系统的设备资助和广告资金平台。在投资应用程序策策的设备资助平台的激励措施,引入其自己的应用程序和设置外部应用程序的应用程序和设置佣金在很大程度上与消费者的应用程序相一致,而广告资助平台则不一定是这种情况。特别是,来自设备资助平台的积极委员会的消费者获得,因为这意味着设备的较低价格,平台和rsquo; S的应用程序被引入和价格内化了对消费者福利的影响,完全在水平模型中。差异化,部分在垂直分化模型中。(c)2021提交人。 elsevier b.v发布。这是CC By-NC-ND许可下的开放式访问文章(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号