首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health >Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
【24h】

Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana

机译:社区成本有效性LED埃塞俄比亚和加纳的总卫生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted cost effectiveness analyses of four different CLTS interventions implemented in Ethiopia and Ghana. In each country, a pilot approach in which additional local actors were trained in CLTS facilitation was compared to the conventional approach. Data were collected using bottom-up costing, household surveys, and observations. We assessed variability of cost effectiveness from a societal perspective for latrine ownership and latrine use outcomes in different contexts. Cost effectiveness ranged from $34-$1897 per household ($5.85-$563 per person) gaining access to a private latrine or stopping open defecation, depending on the intervention, context, and outcome considered. For three out of four interventions, CLTS appeared more cost effective at reducing open defecation than at increasing latrine ownership, although sensitivity analysis revealed considerable variation. The pilot approaches were more cost effective at reducing open defecation than conventional approaches in Ethiopia, but not in Ghana. CLTS has been promoted as a low-cost means of improving the ownership and use of sanitation facilities. In our study, the cost of CLTS per household gaining latrine access was slightly higher than in other studies, and the cost of CLTS per household stopping OD was slightly lower than in other studies. Our results show that aggregate measures mask considerable variability in costs and outcomes, and thus the importance of considering and reporting context and uncertainty in economic analysis of sanitation interventions.
机译:我们在埃塞俄比亚和加纳实施了四种不同的CLTS干预措施分析。在每个国家,将额外的当地演员在CLTS促进培训中,与常规方法进行培训。使用自下而上的成本核算,家庭调查和观察来收集数据。我们评估了在不同背景下的厕所所有权和厕所使用结果的社会视角下的成本效益的可变性。成本效益从每户34-1897美元(每人5.85美元563美元),根据所考虑的干预,背景和结果,获得私人厕所或停止开放排便。对于四种干预措施中的三种干预措施,CLTS在减少开放排放时似乎更具成本效益,而不是在增加LATRINE所有权时,尽管敏感性分析显示了相当大的变化。试点方法在减少开放排放方面比埃塞俄比亚的常规方法更具成本效益,但不在加纳。 CLTS被推广为改善卫生设施所有权和使用的低成本手段。在我们的研究中,每个家庭获得厕所的CLTS的成本略高于其他研究,并且每家家庭停止OD的CLT的成本略低于其他研究。我们的研究结果表明,总措施掩盖了成本和结果的显着变化,从而考虑和报告了卫生干预措施经济分析中的背景和不确定性的重要性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号