首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Life cycle environmental and economic analyses of a hydrogen station with wind energy
【24h】

Life cycle environmental and economic analyses of a hydrogen station with wind energy

机译:具有风能的加氢站的生命周期环境和经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aimed to identify the environmental and economic aspects of the wind-hydrogen system using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The target H_2 pathways are the H_2 pathway of water electrolysis (WE) with wind power (WE[Wind]) and the H_2 pathway of WE by Korean electricity mix (WE[KEM]). Conventional fuels (gasoline and diesel) are also included as target fuel pathways to identify the fuel pathways with economic and environmental advantages over conventional fuels. The key environmental issues in the transportation sector are analyzed in terms of fossil fuel consumption (FFC), regulated air pollutants (RAPs), abiotic resource depletion (ARD), and global warming (GW). The life cycle costs of the target fuel pathways consist of the well-to-tank (WTT) costs and the tank-to-wheel (TTW) costs. Moreover, two scenarios are analyzed to predict potential economic and environmental improvements offered by wind energy-powered hydrogen stations. In LCA results, WE[Wind] is superior to the other pathways in all environmental categories. The LCC results show that the projected WTT cost savings of WE[Wind] and WE[KEM] compared to gasoline are US $ 0.050 and US $ 0.036 per MJ, respectively, because hydrogen will not be subjected to any fuel tax according to the Korean Energy Policy in 2015. Although WE[KEM] and WE [Wind] incur high capital costs owing to the required capital investment in fuel cell vehicles (FCVs), they have lower well-to-wheel (WTW) costs than those of conventional fuels due to the high FCV efficiency in fuel utilization stage. WTW costs for gasoline are higher than those of WE[KEM] and WE[Wind] by US $ 12,600 and US $ 10,200, respectively. This study demonstrated the future competitiveness of the WEfWind] pathway in both environmental and economic aspects. In the WTT stage, the point-of-sale of the electricity produced by the wind power plant (WPP) cannot be controlled because the wind-powered electricity production fluctuates considerably depending on the wind. However, the use of a wind-powered H_2 station in the future enables stable wind power plant management and provides greater economic profit than the present system since the wind-powered electricity can be used for the hydrogen production in the H_2 station and any residual electricity is sold to Korea electric power corporation (KEPCO). If 5% of conventional vehicles in Korea are substituted with FCVs using H_2 via WEfWind] in 2015, CO_2 emission will be reduced by 2,876,000 tons/year and annual LCC costs by US $ 8559 million. Thus, the operation of wind-powered hydrogen stations will encourage the introduction of hydrogen into the transportation fuel market.
机译:这项研究旨在使用生命周期评估(LCA)和生命周期成本(LCC)方法来确定风氢系统的环境和经济方面。目标H_2途径是有风能的水电解(WE)的H_2途径(WE [Wind])和韩国电力混合法(WE [KEM])的WE的H_2途径。还包括常规燃料(汽油和柴油)作为目标燃料通道,以识别与常规燃料相比具有经济和环境优势的燃料通道。根据化石燃料消耗量(FFC),受控空气​​污染物(RAP),非生物资源耗竭(ARD)和全球变暖(GW)来分析交通运输领域的关键环境问题。目标燃料通道的生命周期成本包括油井到坦克(WTT)成本和油罐到车轮(TTW)成本。此外,分析了两种情况,以预测由风能供能的氢站带来的潜在经济和环境改善。在LCA结果中,WE [Wind]在所有环境类别中均优于其他途径。 LCC结果表明,与汽油相比,WE [Wind]和WE [KEM]的预计WTT成本节省分别为每MJ 0.050美元和0.036美元,因为韩国人不会对氢征收任何燃料税2015年的能源政策。尽管由于燃料电池汽车(FCV)所需的资本投资,WE [KEM]和WE [Wind]招致了高昂的资本成本,但与传统燃料相比,它们的轮对井(WTW)成本更低由于在燃料利用阶段FCV效率很高。汽油的WTW成本分别比WE [KEM]和WE [Wind]高出12,600美元和10,200美元。这项研究证明了WEfWind]途径在环境和经济方面的未来竞争力。在WTT阶段,风电厂(WPP)产生的电力的销售点无法控制,因为风能发电量会随风而大幅波动。但是,将来使用风力发电的H_2站可以实现稳定的风力发电厂管理,并且比现有系统提供更大的经济利润,因为风力发电可以用于H_2站的制氢和任何剩余电力出售给韩国电力公司(KEPCO)。如果到2015年韩国5%的传统车辆使用H_2通过WEfWind替换为FCV,则CO_2排放量将减少287.6万吨/年,年度LCC成本将减少85.59亿美元。因此,风力加氢站的运营将鼓励将氢引入运输燃料市场。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of hydrogen energy》 |2010年第6期|p.2213-2225|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Eco Strategy Team, LG Electronics, 16 Woomyeon-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, South Korea;

    Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Konkuk University, 1, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea;

    Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Konkuk University, 1, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea;

    Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Konkuk University, 1, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    wind energy; hydrogen; LCA (life cycle assessment) LCC (life cycle costing);

    机译:风能;氢;LCA(生命周期评估)LCC(生命周期成本);
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:29:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号