首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making method
【24h】

Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making method

机译:通过TOPSIS多准则决策方法对汽车行业燃料电池战略技术开发解决方案进行数学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The mathematical techniques of decision making~(-1)re among the most valuable outcomes of this research activity, which is generally referred to as realization in the operations, operational research or quantitative methods of decision making. Over time, with the increase in the complexity and the variety of decision making problems, the methods of decision making become more varied and will have more capability of problem solving. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a collection of methodologies to compare, select, or rank multiple alternatives that involve incommensurate attributes. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is a multiple criteria method to identify solution from finite set of points. Due to the increase in environmental problems, including various forms of air contamination and to the decrease of fossil sources of energy in the world, there is an increasingly pressing need for a clean method of generating energy. In this paper, we seek to review the guidelines resulting in the strategic technologies of fuel cells as converters in the automotive industry and consider the capabilities and attractions of strategic technology and try to find the development solutions of fuel cell strategic technologies by technical-economical appropriate fields of attention and investment. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to rank the attractiveness and importance of the stack of fuel cells as a sub-system, as well as determine the amount of knowledge, specialized manpower and equipment needed in two industrial and laboratory scales and from among multi-criteria decision making methods, TOPSIS approach has been dealt with. In order to selecting required information in the evaluation stages of method by asking professional experts views, questionnaire method for data gathering was chosen. The results of this paper include ranked essential solutions for the development of technologies for fuel cells as the power systems for vehicles for allocating a 1ttention and investment in the sub-system of stacks of fuel cells by using the multi-criteria decision making selected method (TOPSIS).
机译:决策(-1)的数学技术是这项研究活动中最有价值的成果之一,通常被称为在运营,运营研究或决策的定量方法中的实现。随着时间的流逝,随着决策问题的复杂性和种类的增加,决策方法变得更加多样化,并且将具有更多的解决问题的能力。多标准决策(MCDM)是方法的集合,用于比较,选择或排列涉及不适当属性的多个备选方案。通过与理想解的相似性进行优先排序的技术(TOPSIS)是一种用于从有限点集中识别解的多准则方法。由于环境问题的增加,包括各种形式的空气污染,以及世界上化石能源的减少,对清洁产生能量的方法的需求日益迫切。在本文中,我们试图回顾产生于汽车行业的燃料电池战略技术的指南,并考虑战略技术的能力和吸引力,并尝试通过技术经济的方式找到燃料电池战略技术的开发解决方案。关注和投资领域。因此,本文的目的是对作为一个子系统的燃料电池堆的吸引力和重要性进行排名,并确定两个工业和实验室规模以及从多个领域中获得的知识,专业人力和设备的数量。 -标准决策方法,已经处理了TOPSIS方法。为了在方法评估阶段通过征求专业人士的意见来选择所需的信息,选择了问卷调查法进行数据收集。本文的结果包括通过使用多准则决策选择方法为燃料电池技术开发的排名必不可少的解决方案,燃料电池技术是车辆动力系统,用于在燃料电池堆子系统中分配1权重并进行投资( TOPSIS)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号