首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model
【24h】

Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model

机译:使用日本氢联站模型的定量风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) are becoming widespread across Japan and are essential for the operation of fuel cell vehicles, they present potential hazards. A large number of accidents such as explosions or fires have been reported, rendering it necessary to conduct a number of qualitative and quantitative risk assessments for HRSs. Current safety codes and technical standards related to Japanese HRSs have been established based on the results of a qualitative risk assessment and quantitative effectiveness validation of safety measures over ten years ago. In the last decade, there has been much development in the technologies of the components or facilities used in domestic HRSs and much operational experience as well as knowledge to use hydrogen in HRSs safely have been gained through years of commercial operation. The purpose of the present study is to conduct a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the latest HRS model representing Japanese HRSs with the most current information and to identify the most significant scenarios that pose the greatest risks to the physical surroundings in the HRS model. The results of the QRA show that the risk contours of 10(-3) and 10(-4) per year were confined within the HRS boundaries, whereas the risk contours of 10(-5) and 10(-6) per year are still present outside the HRS. Comparing the breakdown of the individual risks (IRs) at the risk ranking points, we conclude that the risk of jet fire demonstrates the highest contribution to the risks at all of the risk ranking points and outside the station. To reduce these risks and confine the risk contour of 10(-6) per year within the HRS boundaries, it is necessary to consider risk mitigation measures for jet fires. (c) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:虽然氢联站(HRSS)在日本普遍存在,但对燃料电池车辆的运作至关重要,但它们呈现出潜在的危险。报告了大量的事故,例如爆炸或火灾,使有必要对HRSS进行许多定性和定量风险评估。目前的安全守则和与日本HRS相关的技术标准已经基于在十年前的定性风险评估和对安全措施的定量效果验证的结果确定。在过去十年中,国内HRSS中使用的组件或设施的技术以及许多运营经验以及在HRS中使用氢气的知识获得了很大的发展,通过多年的商业运营获得了HRSS。本研究的目的是对代表日本HRSS的最新HRS模型进行定量风险评估(QRA),其中包含最新信息,并确定最重要的场景对HRS模型中的身体环境产生最大的风险。 QRA的结果表明,每年10(-3)和10(-4)的风险轮廓限制在HRS边界内,而每年10(-5)和10(-6)的风险轮廓是仍然存在于HRS之外。比较个人风险(IRS)的破坏在风险排名点,我们得出结论,喷射火灾的风险向所有风险排名点和车站外部的风险表现出最高贡献。为了减少这些风险,并限制在人力资源边界内每年限制10(6)的风险轮廓,有必要考虑喷气式飞机的风险缓解措施。 (c)2020氢能源出版物LLC。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of hydrogen energy》 |2021年第11期|8329-8343|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Yokohama Natl Univ Grad Sch Environm & Informat Sci Hodogayae Ku 79-7 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Yokohama Natl Univ Inst Adv Sci Hodogayae Ku 79-5 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Yokohama Natl Univ Fac Environm & Informat Sci Hodogayae Ku 79-7 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

    Japan Petr Energy Ctr Minato Ku 2-11-1 Shibakoen Tokyo 1050011 Japan;

    Japan Petr Energy Ctr Minato Ku 2-11-1 Shibakoen Tokyo 1050011 Japan;

    Japan Petr Energy Ctr Minato Ku 2-11-1 Shibakoen Tokyo 1050011 Japan;

    Japan Petr Energy Ctr Minato Ku 2-11-1 Shibakoen Tokyo 1050011 Japan;

    Yokohama Natl Univ Inst Adv Sci Hodogayae Ku 79-5 Tokiwadai Yokohama Kanagawa 2408501 Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Quantitative risk assessment; Hydrogen refueling station; Individual risk; Jet fire;

    机译:定量风险评估;氢气加油站;个人风险;喷射火;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号