首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP
【24h】

Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP

机译:基于犹豫模糊AHP的不同制氢方案的可持续性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hydrogen is seen as the key component of energy systems for a sustainable future. In the literature, there has been extensive efforts on making hydrogen energy systems more sustainable. True sustainability of such systems requires hydrogen to be produced in clean, reliable, affordable, and safe manners without harming neither the environment nor the societies. In the literature, there is a lack of studies focusing on a complete technical, environmental, social, and economic evaluation of hydrogen production systems by taking availability and reliability into account. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive review and investigation on sustainability of hydrogen production systems, which could potentially guide researchers, policy makers, different industries, and energy market customers. The selected hydrogen production methods are grid electrolysis (electricity from fossil fuels), wind electrolysis, PV electrolysis, nuclear thermochemical water splitting cycles, solar thermochemical water splitting cycles and photoelectrochemical cells. To deal with the ambiguity and vagueness in the evaluation process, and to overcome the observed hesitancy in decision makers' preferences, a novel approach, hesitant fuzzy AHP, is used to evaluate sustainability of the selected hydrogen production methods. In the proposed model, five criteria; economic performance (initial cost and running cost), environmental performance (GHG emissions, land use, water discharge quality, and solid waste), social performance (impact on public health, employment and training opportunities, and public acceptance), technical performance (energy and exergy efficiencies, process control, and raw material input), and availability/reliability (dependence on imported resources, predictability, and scalability) are taken into account. The results show that grid electrolysis is expected to hold the key of sustainable hydrogen production in the near future while the technologies of other methods advance and their associated costs decrease. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:氢被视为实现可持续未来的能源系统的关键组成部分。在文献中,为使氢能系统更具可持续性做出了广泛的努力。这种系统的真正可持续性要求以清洁,可靠,可负担和安全的方式生产氢气,而又不损害环境和社会。在文献中,缺乏通过考虑可用性和可靠性来集中精力对制氢系统进行完整的技术,环境,社会和经济评估的研究。因此,本研究的主要目的是对制氢系统的可持续性进行全面的审查和调查,从而有可能指导研究人员,政策制定者,不同行业和能源市场客户。选定的制氢方法是网格电解(化石燃料发电),风能电解,光伏电解,核热化学水分解循环,太阳能热化学水分解循环和光电化学电池。为了处理评估过程中的歧义和模糊性,并克服决策者偏好中观察到的犹豫,采用了一种新颖的方法,即犹豫模糊AHP法,来评估所选制氢方法的可持续性。在建议的模型中,有五个标准;经济绩效(初始成本和运营成本),环境绩效(GHG排放,土地使用,排水质量和固体废物),社会绩效(对公共卫生,就业和培训机会的影响以及公众的接受程度),技术绩效(能源)以及效率,过程控制和原材料输入)以及可用性/可靠性(取决于进口资源,可预测性和可伸缩性)。结果表明,随着其他方法技术的发展和相关成本的降低,预计在不久的将来网格电解将成为可持续制氢的关键。 (C)2018氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号