首页> 外文期刊>International journal of human-computer interaction >Whose Experience Do We Care About? Analysis of the Fitness of Scrum and Kanban to User Experience
【24h】

Whose Experience Do We Care About? Analysis of the Fitness of Scrum and Kanban to User Experience

机译:我们关心谁的经验? Scrum和看板对用户体验的适应性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two project management approaches, Agile and Lean, have increasingly been adopted in recent years for software development. Meanwhile, in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI), user experience (UX) has become central in research and practice. The new hybrids between the two fieldsAgile UX and Lean UXwere born a few years ago. As Agile, Lean, and UX have different principles and practices, one can query whether the couplings are well justified and whether Agile or Lean is more compatible with UX work. We have conducted a conceptual analysis and tended to conclude that Lean instantiated as Kanban fits UX work better than Agile instantiated as Scrum. To explore further our claim, we performed a secondary data analysis of 10 semistructured interviews with practitioners working with Scrum and Kanban in different sectors (Study 1). This study enabled us to gain insights into the applications of the two processes in real-life cases, their strengths and weaknesses, and factors influencing the practicality of implementing them. Both processes seem not favorable for UX work in practice. Among others, one intriguing observation is loose adherence to the related guidelines and principles. A query derived from the analyses of the interviews is that customer, as compared with user, has more frequently been referred to by our interviewees, irrespective of the process they adopted. We have then been motivated to investigate this issue, using a web-based survey with another batch of practitioners (N = 73) in the software industry (Study 2). Results of the survey indicate that the practitioners in general had a reasonable understanding of the concepts user and customer, although a minority tended to treat them as synonyms. Limitations of the current studies and implications for future work are discussed.
机译:近年来,越来越多地采用两种项目管理方法Agile和Lean进行软件开发。同时,在人机交互(HCI)领域,用户体验(UX)已成为研究和实践的中心。敏捷用户体验和精益用户体验这两个领域之间的新混合体是几年前诞生的。由于Agile,Lean和UX具有不同的原理和实践,因此可以查询耦合是否合理,以及Agile或Lean与UX工作是否更兼容。我们进行了概念分析,并倾向于得出以下结论:精益实例化为看板,比敏捷实例化为Scrum更适合UX工作。为了进一步探讨我们的主张,我们对来自不同部门的Scrum和看板工作的从业人员进行了10次半结构化访谈的辅助数据分析(研究1)。这项研究使我们能够深入了解这两个过程在实际案例中的应用,它们的优缺点以及影响实现它们的实用性的因素。在实践中,这两个过程似乎都不适合UX工作。除其他外,一个有趣的发现是对相关准则和原则的严格遵守。从访谈分析中得出的疑问是,与用户相比,我们的受访者会更频繁地推荐客户,而与他们采用的过程无关。然后,我们与其他一批软件行业从业者(N = 73)进行了基于Web的调查,从而激发了调查此问题的能力(研究2)。调查结果表明,从业人员总体上对用户和客户的概念有合理的了解,尽管少数人倾向于将它们视为同义词。讨论了当前研究的局限性及其对未来工作的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号