首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer >If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation?
【24h】

If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation?

机译:如果Dittus和Boelter方程确实是McAdams方程,那么McAdams方程不应该真的是Koo方程吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In his technical note "Where did the Dittus and Boelter equation come from?", R.H.S. Winterton showed the likely creator of the modern version of the Dittus and Boelter equation was actually McAdams. The following note further investigates Winterton's claim and finds conclusive evidence that the Dittus and Boelter equation did indeed originate with McAdams. The fortuitous combination of the "so-called" McAdams equation for smooth tube friction factor with the Reynolds analogy provides the leading coefficient of 0.023. McAdams actually attributes the usage of fluid bulk properties to his form of the equation to the work of Dittus and Boelter. Along the way, it was also found that what is commonly known as the McAdams equation for smooth tube friction factor is actually the work of E.C. Koo, his graduate student.
机译:R.H.S.在他的技术说明“ Dittus和Boelter方程从哪里来?”温特顿(Winterton)表明,现代版本的Dittus和Boelter方程的创建者实际上是McAdams。以下注释进一步研究了温特顿的主张,并找到确凿的证据证明Dittus和Boelter方程确实是由McAdams提出的。平滑管摩擦系数的“所谓” McAdams方程与雷诺类比的偶然组合提供了0.023的超前系数。 McAdams实际上将流体体积性质的使用归因于Dittus和Boelter的方程式。沿途还发现,通常所说的光滑管摩擦系数的McAdams方程实际上是他的研究生E.C. Koo的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利