首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer >An experimental study of the air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having plain, louver, and semi-dimple vortex generator configuration
【24h】

An experimental study of the air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having plain, louver, and semi-dimple vortex generator configuration

机译:具有平面,百叶窗和半凹痕涡流发生器结构的翅片管热交换器的空气侧性能的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, a comparative study of the airside performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having plain, louver, and semi-dimple vortex generator (VG) are made. A total of eighteen samples are made and tested with the corresponding fin pitch (F_p) being 1.6 mm and 2.0 mm and the number of tube row (N) are 1, 2 and 4, respectively. Test results indicate that the heat transfer coefficient for N= 1 for louver fin geometry with a smaller fin pitch of 1.6 mm is higher than that of semi-dimple VG and plain fin geometry. For N= 1 with a larger fin pitch of 2.0 mm, the semi-dimple VG is marginally higher than that of louver fin geometry when the frontal velocity is lower than 2 ms~(-1). However, the trend is reversed where the heat transfer coefficient for louver fin outperforms that of semi-dimple VG when the velocity is increased further. For the airside performance for N = 2 or N = 4, the heat transfer coefficients for louver fin geometry is about 2-15% higher than those of semi-dimple geometry. The difference is increased with the rising velocity and the results prevail for both fin pitches. However, the difference is . smaller at a larger fin pitch due to the comparatively effectively swirled motion of the semi-dimple VG. The effect of the number of tube row on the heat transfer coefficients is negligible for louver fin geometry and is also rather small for semi-dimple VG. For the plain fin geometry, the effect of tube row is also small when N > 1. The heat transfer performance for N = 1 is different from N = 2 or N = 4 due to its inline configuration.
机译:在这项研究中,对具有平面,百叶窗和半凹痕涡流发生器(VG)的翅片管热交换器的空气侧性能进行了比较研究。总共制作并测试了18个样品,相应的翅片间距(F_p)为1.6 mm和2.0 mm,管排数(N)分别为1、2和4。测试结果表明,散热片间距为1.6 mm的百叶窗式散热片的N = 1传热系数高于半凹坑VG和普通散热片的传热系数。当鳍片间距为2.0 mm的N = 1时,正面速度低于2 ms〜(-1)时,半酒窝VG略高于百叶窗鳍片几何形状。但是,这种趋势是相反的,当速度进一步提高时,百叶窗鳍片的传热系数优于半酒窝VG的传热系数。对于N = 2或N = 4的空气侧性能,百叶窗翅片几何形状的传​​热系数比半凹窝几何形状的传​​热系数高约2-15%。差异随着速度的增加而增加,并且结果以两个鳍片节距为准。但是,差异为。由于半酒窝VG的相对有效的涡旋运动,因此在较大的鳍片间距处减小了尺寸。管排数对传热系数的影响对于百叶窗翅片的几何形状可以忽略不计,而对于半凹坑VG来说也很小。对于普通的翅片几何形状,当N> 1时,管排的影响也很小。由于N = 1或N = 4的内联结构,N = 1的传热性能有所不同。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;

    Green Energy & Environment Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan;

    Green Energy & Environment Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Fin-and-tube heat exchanger; Louver fin; Vortex generator;

    机译:翅片管换热器;百叶窗鳍;涡流发生器;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号