首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geomechanics >New Calculating Approach for the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of a Shallow Foundation
【24h】

New Calculating Approach for the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of a Shallow Foundation

机译:浅基础极限承载力的新计算方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The conventional method for calculating the bearing capacity is the method derived by Terzaghi, in which the embedment is simulated as a surface surcharge. The total bearing capacity is determined with two different failure mechanisms using the superposition method. Although a large number of solutions of the bearing capacity coefficient N-gamma have been presented by different authors, no exactly defined failure mechanism for estimating N-gamma is available. A new approach was developed in this study without a simulated embedment as a surface surcharge that utilizes two methods, the individual minimum (IM) and global minimum (GM), based on the limit equilibrium method to estimate the bearing capacity. The failure mechanisms for determining the bearing capacity, the critical failure mechanisms for the resistance forces due to cohesion and soil weight, respectively, were defined with two angles alpha and beta. The results of the IM method with superposition method were acceptable when compared with those obtained using the German Standard DIN 4017; the greatest difference between the results obtained with these two methods was approximately 8%. Using the GM method, the total bearing capacity was estimated with the well-defined influential single failure mechanism, and the results were compared with the results of the finite-element analysis. The influential failure mechanisms were comparable with each other, and the results of bearing capacities using finite elements were overestimated. The new approach could be suitable for practical applications.
机译:计算承载力的常规方法是Terzaghi推导的方法,其中将嵌入模拟为表面附加力。使用叠加方法通过两种不同的失效机制确定总承载能力。尽管不同作者已经提出了许多有关承载力系数N-γ的解决方案,但尚无用于定义N-γ的精确定义的失效机制。在这项研究中开发了一种新方法,该方法没有模拟嵌入作为表面附加费,该方法基于极限平衡法来估计承载力,该方法采用了两种方法:个体最小值(IM)和全局最小值(GM)。用两个角度α和β定义了确定承载能力的破坏机制,分别针对内聚力和土壤重量的抵抗力的关键破坏机制。与德国标准DIN 4017相比,采用叠加法的IM方法的结果是可以接受的。这两种方法获得的结果之间的最大差异约为8%。使用GM方法,通过定义明确的有影响的单一破坏机制估算总承载力,并将结果与​​有限元分析的结果进行比较。影响的失效机理彼此可比,并且使用有限元的承载力结果被高估了。新方法可能适用于实际应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号