...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Geographical Information Science >Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures
【24h】

Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures

机译:地方政府数据共享:评估空间数据基础架构的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a typology of local-government data sharing arrangements in the US at a time when spatial data infrastructures (SDI) are moving into a second generation. In the first generation, the US National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) theoretically involved a pyramid of data integration resting on local-government data sharing. Availability of local-government data is the foundation for all SDI-related data sharing in this model. However, first-generation SDI data-sharing activities and principles have gained only a tenuous hold in local governments. Some formalized data sharing occurs, but only infrequently in response to SDI programmes and policies. Previous research suggests that local-government data sharing aligns with immediate organizational and practical concerns rather than state or national policies and programmes. We present research findings echoing extending these findings to show that local-government data sharing is largely informal in nature and is undertaken to support existing governmental activities. NSDI principles remain simply irrelevant for the majority of surveyed local governments. The typology we present distinguishes four distinct types of local-government data sharing arrangements that reflect institutional, political, and economic factors. The effectiveness of second generation, client-service-based SDI will be seriously constrained if the problems of local government take-up fail to be addressed.
机译:本文介绍了在空间数据基础架构(SDI)进入第二代之际的美国地方政府数据共享安排的类型。在第一代中,美国国家空间数据基础结构(NSDI)理论上涉及基于地方政府数据共享的数据集成金字塔。本地政府数据的可用性是此模型中所有SDI相关数据共享的基础。但是,第一代SDI数据共享活动和原则在地方政府中只是微不足道的。发生了一些形式化的数据共享,但是很少响应SDI程序和策略。先前的研究表明,地方政府数据共享符合当前的组织和实际问题,而不是州或国家的政策和计划。我们提出的研究结果与对这些研究结果的扩展相呼应,以表明地方政府数据共享本质上是非正式的,旨在支持现有的政府活动。 NSDI原则对于大多数接受调查的地方政府而言根本无关紧要。我们介绍的类型学区分了反映机构,政治和经济因素的四种不同类型的地方政府数据共享安排。如果无法解决地方政府的使用问题,第二代基于客户服务的SDI的有效性将受到严重限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号