首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Game Theory >Allocating the costs of cleaning a river: expected responsibility versus median responsibility
【24h】

Allocating the costs of cleaning a river: expected responsibility versus median responsibility

机译:分配清洁河流的成本:预期责任与中位责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider the problem of cleaning a transboundary river, proposed by Ni and Wang (Games Econ Behav 60:176-186, 2007). A river is modeled as a segment divided into subsegments, each occupied by one region, from upstream to downstream. The waste is transferred from one region to the next at some rate. Since this transfer rate may be unknown, the social planner could have uncertainty over each region's responsibility. Two natural candidates to distribute the costs in this setting would be the method that assigns to each region its expected responsibility and the one that assigns to each region its median responsibility. We show that the latter is equivalent to the Upstream Responsibility method (Alcalde-Unzu et al. in Games Econ Behav 90:134-150, 2015) and the former is a new method that we call Expected Responsibility. We compare both solutions and analyze them in terms of a new property of monotonicity.
机译:我们考虑清洁NI和WANG提出的跨界河流的问题(游戏ECON表现60:176-186,2007)。 河流被建模为分为分为底段的段,每个部分由一个区域占据,从上游到下游。 废物以某个区域从一个区域转移到下一个速率。 由于这种转移率可能是未知的,社会策划者可能对每个地区的责任产生不确定性。 在此设置中分配成本的两位自然候选者将是分配给其预期责任的方法和分配给每个地区其中位责任的方法。 我们表明,后者相当于上游责任方法(Alcalde-Unzu等人。在游戏ECON现行90:134-150,2015)和前者是我们称之为预期责任的新方法。 我们比较两个解决方案并根据单调性的新属性分析它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号