首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Fracture >Fractal Analysis and Synthesis of Fracture Surface Roughness and Related Forms of Complexity and Disorder
【24h】

Fractal Analysis and Synthesis of Fracture Surface Roughness and Related Forms of Complexity and Disorder

机译:分形分析与断裂表面粗糙度及其相关形式的复杂性和综合性的综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Roughness is, among human sensations, just as fundamental as color or pitch, or as heaviness or hotness. But its study had remained in a more primitive state, by far. The reason was that both geometry and science were first drawn to smooth shapes. Thus, color and pitch came to be measured in cycles per seconds, that is, were reduced to sinusoids, in other words to uniform motions around a circle – the epitome of a smooth shape. A study of roughness had necessarily to wait until specific mathematical tools had been discovered and, much later, suitably interpreted. Fractal geometry began when I reinterpreted the flight from nature that had led mathematicians to conceive of notions like the Holder exponent, the Cantor set, or the Hausdorff dimension. They boasted of these notions being ‘monstrous’ but in fact I turned them over into everyday tools of science. I also added further tools that – taken together – made roughness quantitatively measurable for the first time. Acquiring a quantitative measure is the step that moves a field into maturity. And this move instantly led to a striking conjecture. In 1984, ‘Nature’ published an article I wrote with D. A. Passoja and A. J. Paullay on metal fractures. We found that the traditional measures of their roughness range all over. To the contrary, their fractal roughness varies very little not only between samples but also between materials. Last time I checked the “universality” had been extended but not explained. The new intrinsic measure created a major intellectual mystery. The first major new tool that I added to those contributed by the likes of Holder, Cantor, and Hausdorff was multifractality, for both measures and functions. I was motivated by the urge to model the intermittence of turbulence but my first full paper (in 1972) also noted that the same techniques ought to apply to the intermittence in the variation of financial prices. An ancient adage claimed that the City of London is as unpredictable as the weather. I found unexpectedly quantitative truth to this adage by showing that both phenomena can be tackled with essentially the same tools. Roughness is everywhere therefore fractal geometry has little fear of running out of problems. This address will sketch the fractal geometry of roughness and explore some new developments relevant to this Congress.
机译:在人的感觉中,粗糙度就像颜色或间距或沉重或闷热一样基本。但是到目前为止,它的研究还处于一个更原始的状态。原因是几何学和科学都首先被绘制成平滑的形状。因此,颜色和螺距以每秒的周期来测量,即减少为正弦波,换言之,以均匀的绕圆周运动为中心–光滑形状的缩影。对粗糙度的研究必须等到发现特定的数学工具,然后再进行适当的解释。分形几何学是在我重新解释了自然界的逃亡之后开始的,这一逃亡使数学家想到了诸如Holder指数,Cantor集或Hausdorff维度之类的概念。他们吹嘘这些概念“太神奇了”,但实际上我把它们变成了日常的科学工具。我还添加了其他工具,这些工具在一起使首次可以定量测量粗糙度。获取定量度量是使一个领域成熟的步骤。这一举动立刻导致了一个惊人的猜想。 1984年,《自然》发表了我与D. A. Passoja和A. J. Paullay撰写的有关金属断裂的文章。我们发现,传统的粗糙度测量方法无处不在。相反,它们的分形粗糙度不仅在样品之间而且在材料之间也几乎没有变化。上次我检查“通用性”已扩展但未解释。这项新的内在措施创造了一个重​​大的知识奥秘。我添加到Holder,Cantor和Hausdorff等公司提供的工具中的第一个主要新工具是用于度量和功能的多重分形。我渴望为湍流的间隔建模,但我的第一篇论文(1972年)也指出,相同的技术也应适用于金融价格变动的间隔。一句古老的谚语声称,伦敦市与天气一样不可预测。通过证明可以用基本相同的工具来解决这两种现象,我发现了这句话的出乎意料的定量真理。粗糙度无处不在,因此分形几何几乎不用担心会出现问题。该演讲将勾勒出粗糙度的分形几何结构,并探索与本次大会有关的一些新进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号