首页> 外文期刊>International journal of financial services management >Credit and investment risk: a comparative analysis of conventional and Islamic banks
【24h】

Credit and investment risk: a comparative analysis of conventional and Islamic banks

机译:信贷和投资风险:传统银行和伊斯兰银行的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For a developing country such as Bangladesh, the banking system is one of the most important preconditions to achieve economic development. This study covers a five-year period (2007-2011) and includes ten sample banks from the Islamic and conventional banking sectors to study the credit/investment risk of the two streams of banking. For this study, two portfolios of the two streams of banking have been constructed to perform an analysis and for document finding in the form of sector averages. Analysis revealed that return on assets of conventional banks is better than that of Islamic banks. Non-performing loans of conventional banks are significantly higher than those of Islamic banks for the period from 2007 to 2011, which indicates conventional banks' inefficiency in credit risk management. Therefore, this study concludes that in managing credit risk, some indicators support better performance of conventional banks, but some refute the claim. With proper guidelines and cautious operations, both the banking streams can mitigate their credit/investment risk.
机译:对于孟加拉国这样的发展中国家,银行体系是实现经济发展的最重要前提之一。这项研究为期五年(2007年至2011年),包括来自伊斯兰和传统银行业的十家样本银行,以研究两种银行业的信贷/投资风险。对于本研究,已构建了两种银行业务流的两个投资组合,以进行分析并以部门平均值的形式查找文件。分析显示,传统银行的资产收益率要高于伊斯兰银行。传统银行的不良贷款在2007年至2011年期间显着高于伊斯兰银行,这表明传统银行的信用风险管理效率低下。因此,本研究得出的结论是,在管理信贷风险方面,一些指标支持传统银行的较好业绩,但有些人驳斥了这一要求。有了适当的指导方针和谨慎的操作,两个银行部门都可以减轻其信贷/投资风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号