...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of finance & economics >The efficacy of financial futures as a hedging tool in electricity markets
【24h】

The efficacy of financial futures as a hedging tool in electricity markets

机译:金融期货作为电力市场中对冲工具的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper estimates and applies a risk management strategy for electricity spot exposures using futures hedging. We apply our approach to 3 of the most actively traded European electricity markets, Nordpool, APXUK, and Phelix. We compare both optimal hedging strategies and the hedging effectiveness of these markets for 2 hedging horizons, weekly and monthly using both Variance and Value at Risk. Our key finding is that electricity futures can effectively manage risk only for specific time periods when using hedging strategies that have been very successful in financial and other commodity markets. More generally, they are ineffective as a risk management tool when compared with other energy assets. This is especially true at the weekly frequency. We also find significant differences in both the optimal hedge ratios and the hedging effectiveness of the different electricity markets. Better performance is found for the Nordpool market, whereas the poorest performer in hedging terms is the Phelix market.
机译:本文使用期货套期保值估计并应用了针对现货风险的风险管理策略。我们将我们的方法应用于3个交易最活跃的欧洲电力市场,即Nordpool,APXUK和Phelix。我们使用方差和风险价值比较每周和每月两个套期的最佳套期策略和这些市场的套期有效性。我们的主要发现是,使用在金融和其他商品市场上非常成功的对冲策略,电力期货只能在特定时间段内有效地管理风险。更一般而言,与其他能源资产相比,它们作为风险管理工具无效。在每周的频率上尤其如此。我们还发现不同电力市场的最佳套期保值比率和套期有效性均存在显着差异。 Nordpool市场的表现更好,而对冲方面表现最差的是Phelix市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号