首页> 外文期刊>International journal of finance & economics >The dilemma between fund-style consistency and active management over the economic cycle. Evidence from pension funds
【24h】

The dilemma between fund-style consistency and active management over the economic cycle. Evidence from pension funds

机译:经济周期基金风格一致性与积极管理之间的困境。来自养老基金的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines whether equity-allocation shifts (equity-holding and equity-style shifts) jeopardize retirement savings in U.K. equity pension funds. Fund-style shifts may deviate pension funds from their original risk profile and expose participants to undesired results. Nonetheless, these shifts may be the result of an active management to adapt to market cycles. Financial literature usually points out the policy-allocation importance versus the active management in explaining fund returns; however, we find significant relation between them. Our results show that managers vary their portfolios to add value, avoid the constraints of preserving consistent styles, and adapt to market conditions. Participants do not negatively react to style changes because top shifter funds are run by skillful managers and outperform. Nevertheless, managers must be aware of their limitations and the risk taken with this strategy. Poor skilled managers do not successfully implement style-shift strategies, especially in crises.
机译:本文审查了股权分配转移(股权持有和股票式转移)危害股权养老金资金。基金样式可能会偏离其原始风险概况的养老基金,并将参与者暴露于不期望的结果。尽管如此,这些班次可能是适应市场周期的活动管理的结果。金融文学通常指出政策分配重要性与积极管理在解释基金退货时;但是,我们在它们之间找到了重要的关系。我们的结果表明,管理人员可以增加其投资组合来增加价值,避免保留一致风格的约束,并适应市场条件。参与者对风格的变化没有负面反应,因为顶部变速器基金由熟练的管理者经营和优于胜过。尽管如此,管理人员必须意识到他们的局限性,并且采取了这种策略的风险。较差的技术经理不会成功实施风格换档策略,尤其是在危机中。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号