首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Fatigue >Simulation and comparison of several crack closure assessment methodologies using three-dimensional finite element analysis
【24h】

Simulation and comparison of several crack closure assessment methodologies using three-dimensional finite element analysis

机译:基于三维有限元分析的几种裂纹闭合评估方法的仿真与比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plasticity induced fatigue crack closure simulations were performed using a three-dimensional finite element analysis of a single edge-cracked tension specimen under constant amplitude loading and load ratio R = 0. Four different methodologies were considered to assess fatigue crack closure: (a) a node displacement method monitoring the first and second nodes behind the crack tip, (b) a contact stress method, (c) the traditional compliance offset method, and (d) the adjusted compliance ratio (ACR) technique. The evolution of crack driving force was compared in terms of V = ΔK_(eff)/ΔK, where ΔK_(eff) and ΔK are the effective and applied stress intensity factor ranges, respectively. The node displacement method using the first node behind the crack tip and the contact stress method produced the lowest levels of U. Larger U levels were obtained from the node displacement method using the second node behind the crack tip followed by those from the compliance offset technique. The ACR methodology provided the highest U values for the range of applied loading considered in this study.
机译:在恒定振幅载荷和载荷比R = 0的情况下,使用单个边缘裂纹拉伸试样的三维有限元分析对塑性诱导的疲劳裂纹闭合进行了模拟。考虑了四种不同的方法来评估疲劳裂纹闭合:(a)a节点位移法监视裂纹尖端后面的第一节点和第二节点,(b)接触应力法,(c)传统的柔度补偿方法,以及(d)调整的柔度比(ACR)技术。用V =ΔK_(eff)/ΔK比较了裂纹驱动力的变化,其中ΔK_(eff)和ΔK分别是有效应力强度因子和施加应力强度因子范围。使用裂纹尖端后面的第一节点的节点位移方法和接触应力方法产生的U值最低。使用裂纹尖端后面的第二个节点的节点位移方法以及顺应性偏移技术获得的U值较大。 。对于本研究中考虑的施加载荷范围,ACR方法提供了最高的U值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号