...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Energy Sector Management >Energy and climate policies to 2020: the impacts of the European '20/20/20' approach
【24h】

Energy and climate policies to 2020: the impacts of the European '20/20/20' approach

机译:到2020年的能源和气候政策:欧洲“ 20/20/20”方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to quantify the possible interactions among the three European objectives in the horizon of 2020: the reduction of 20 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG); the saving of 20 per cent of the European energy consumption; and a share of 20 per cent of renewable energies in the overall energy consumption. Particular focus is, however, placed on the influence of the CO_2 emission reduction targets and on their consequences on the carbon price in 2020. Design/methodology/approach - In order to explore the interactions among the three European objectives and their induced effects, a number of scenarios are tested within a combination of two modeling tools: the POLES world energy model and ASPEN, an auxiliary model dedicated to the analysis of quota trading systems. With reasonable assumptions for the burden sharing among the member states, the energy efficiency objectives and the renewable energy targets are achieved using national quota systems in each European country (white and green certificate systems and their implicit prices), while the CO_2 emission reduction is carried out within the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in line with the objective of 20 per cent emission reduction. Findings - The paper shows, in particular, that the two quota policies (white certificates and green certificates) decrease significantly the European marginal emission reduction cost and consequently, the compliance costs for ETS participants. The high-renewable target compliance cost could be reduced significantly if carbon price signal and energy saving policies are in place. The paper also shows that the sole carbon price signal has a limited influence for stimulating renewable energies and energy savings and thus concludes on the need for specific policies targeting these two areas. Originality/value - This paper is a first attempt to comprehensively deal with the economic fundamentals of the 3D regulatory system proposed by the Commission for Energy and Climate and is of value in proposing a comprehensive approach of the economics of the "20/20/20" European policy.
机译:目的-本文的目的是量化到2020年欧洲三个目标之间可能的相互作用:减少20%的温室气体排放;节省了欧洲能源消耗的20%;在可再生能源中占总能耗的20%。但是,要特别关注2020年CO_2减排目标的影响及其对碳价格的影响。设计/方法/方法-为了探索欧洲三个目标之间的相互作用及其诱发的影响,在两个建模工具的组合中测试了许多方案:POLES世界能源模型和ASPEN,ASPEN是专门用于分析配额交易系统的辅助模型。在合理假设各成员国之间分担负担的情况下,使用每个欧洲国家的国家配额制度(白色和绿色证书制度及其隐性价格)实现了能效目标和可再生能源目标,同时进行了CO_2减排在欧洲排放交易计划(ETS)中实现减排目标20%。调查结果-该文件特别表明,这两个配额政策(白色证书和绿色证书)显着降低了欧洲边际减排成本,并因此降低了ETS参与者的合规成本。如果制定了碳价信号和节能政策,可以大幅降低高可再生性目标合规成本。该论文还表明,唯一的碳价信号在刺激可再生能源和节能方面影响有限,因此得出了针对这两个领域的具体政策的必要性的结论。原创性/价值-本文是对能源和气候委员会提议的3D监管体系的经济基础进行全面处理的首次尝试,并且对于提出“ 20/20/20欧洲政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号