...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Ecology & Enviromental Sciences >Anthropogenic Pressures on the Natural Resources in Fringe Areas of the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve
【24h】

Anthropogenic Pressures on the Natural Resources in Fringe Areas of the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve

机译:Khangchendzonga生物圈保护区边缘地区自然资源的人为压力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An assessment of anthropogenic pressure in the buffer forest areas of the recently notified Khagchendzonga Biosphere Reserve (KBR) shows traditional dependence of the inhabitants of the fringe area settlements on forest-based natural resources. Buffer zone forests often act as the source of such resource needs with varying extraction frequencies. Observations on resources extraction patterns and use revealed the dependence of the inhabitants for their needs of fodder, fuelwood, timber and other NTFPs. Higher altitude settlements had higher dependency on the forest resources. The probability of use of fuel species such as Prunus cerasoides was maximum (0.88) and Resource Use index (RUI) was high for Leucosceptrum canum (670.6). The amounts of firewood used in winter were more with high collection frequency during morning sessions. Fuel species had many uses but space heating and preparation of drinks consumed maximum fuelwood. Similarly, the NTEPs were used for meeting the ethno -cultural and therapeutic needs. Forest resource use to provide inputs to the subsistence farming was also observed. Ecological impacts vary from settlement to settlement but point to long-term impacts of such anthropogenic pressures. Resources contributed by forests and other sources were far more ( > 90% in case of fodder) than the production of farm-based resources. Open grazing by animals ranges from 62% to 80% with transhumance practices prevailing at higher altitudes. Some animals showed high bite rates and foraging periods, and could be regarded as threat to the existing ecosystem. The present status of resources has been interpreted by analysing the landuse/land cover by remote sensing methods. Judicious management of the fringe area settlements in terms of village socioeconomy, resource needs and enhanced on-farm based resource production may reduce such pressures. Further enhancement of local knowledge in conservation efforts could be the options for resolving future resource problems. Emphasis on better livelihood options of the local communities vis-a-vis legal protection of resources would help in minimizing such pressures in such a newly created protected area.
机译:对最近通报的哈格琴宗加生物圈保护区(KBR)缓冲区森林地区的人为压力进行的评估表明,边缘地区居民的传统习惯是依靠森林自然资源。缓冲区森林经常以不同的提取频率充当此类资源需求的来源。对资源开采方式和利用的观察表明,居民对饲料,薪柴,木材和其他非木材林产品的需求具有依赖性。海拔越高,对森林资源的依赖性越高。象鼻李(Ceucosceptrum canum)的燃料种类如李子(Prunus cerasoides)的使用可能性最大(0.88),资源使用指数(RUI)高(670.6)。冬季使用的木柴数量更多,早晨时段的木柴收集频率较高。燃料种类有许多用途,但空间取暖和饮料制备消耗了最多的薪柴。同样,NTEP被用于满足种族文化和治疗需求。还观察到利用森林资源为自给农业提供投入。生态影响因定居点而异,但指出了这种人为压力的长期影响。森林和其他来源提供的资源远比以农场为基础的资源生产(在饲料的情况下> 90%)更多。动物的野外放牧占62%至80%,高海拔地区普遍存在超人类的放牧方式。一些动物的咬合率和觅食时间都很高,可以视为对现有生态系统的威胁。通过利用遥感方法分析土地利用/土地覆盖来解释资源的现状。从乡村社会经济,资源需求以及基于农场的资源生产等方面对边缘地区定居点进行明智的管理可能会减轻这种压力。在保护工作中进一步增强当地知识可能是解决未来资源问题的选择。相对于对资源的法律保护,强调当地社区提供更好的生计选择,将有助于最大程度地减少这种新建立的保护区的压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号