首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Consumer Studies >A comparison of Hausman's and Breslaw-Smith's methods in estimating consumer welfare loss because of fuel taxes
【24h】

A comparison of Hausman's and Breslaw-Smith's methods in estimating consumer welfare loss because of fuel taxes

机译:Hausman和Breslaw-Smith估算燃油税造成的消费者福利损失的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we investigate the welfare effect of US gasoline consumption caused by fuel taxes. Using two different economics approaches - the Hausman method and the Breslaw and Smith method - in measuring consumer welfare loss, we calculate compensating variation (CV) and the corresponding dead weight loss (DWL) assuming there are changes in motor gasoline tax. Our analysis shows that tax revenue, CV and DWL increases as motor gasoline tax increases, but the social welfare loss measured in DWL increases far more rapidly than the other two.
机译:在本文中,我们调查了由燃油税引起的美国汽油消费的福利效应。在测量消费者福利损失时,使用了两种不同的经济学方法-Hausman方法以及Breslaw和Smith方法-假定汽车汽油税有所变化,我们计算补偿差异(CV)和相应的失重损失(DWL)。我们的分析表明,税收,CV和DWL随着汽车汽油税的增加而增加,但DWL中衡量的社会福利损失的增长速度远远快于其他两个。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号