首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Computers & Applications >JPEG2000 AND JPEG: IMAGE QUALITY COMPARISON OF COMPRESSED MEDICAL MODALITIES
【24h】

JPEG2000 AND JPEG: IMAGE QUALITY COMPARISON OF COMPRESSED MEDICAL MODALITIES

机译:JPEG2000和JPEG:压缩医学形式的图像质量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Due to the constrained bandwidth and storage capacity, medical images must be compressed before transmission and storage. However, the compression will reduce the image fidelity, especially when the image is compressed of lower bit rate, which cannot be tolerated in medical field. In this paper, the lossy compression performance of the new JPEG2000 and the more conventional Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) is studied and compared. The parameters used for comparison include the compression efficiency, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), picture quality scale (PQS), and mean opinion score (MOS). Four types of medical modalities are used: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Overall, the study shows that JPEG2000 compression is more acceptable and superior compared to JPEG. The compression threshold point is also roughly determined for each of the medical image type.
机译:由于带宽和存储容量的限制,医学图像必须在传输和存储之前进行压缩。然而,压缩将降低图像保真度,特别是当图像以较低比特率压缩时,这在医学领域是不能容忍的。在本文中,对新型JPEG2000和更传统的联合图像专家组(JPEG)的有损压缩性能进行了研究和比较。用于比较的参数包括压缩效率,峰值信噪比(PSNR),图像质量等级(PQS)和平均意见得分(MOS)。使用四种类型的医疗模式:磁共振成像(MRI),超声,X射线和计算机断层扫描(CT)。总体而言,该研究表明,与JPEG相比,JPEG2000压缩更容易接受且更出色。还针对每种医学图像类型大致确定压缩阈值点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号