首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology >Performance comparison of SDN OpenFlow controllers
【24h】

Performance comparison of SDN OpenFlow controllers

机译:SDN OpenFlow控制器的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Software defined networking (SDN) is the centralised network management technology that could reduce the network administration and policy enforcement overhead in the traditional IP networking. SDN controller is the network operating system responsible for entire network operations. However, there are many open source controllers available, such as NOX, POX, FloodLight and OpenDaylight. Each controller has its own properties that could support specific requirements. In this paper, we have compared the performance of most familiar OpenFlow controllers like NOX, POX, Ryu, FloodLight and OpenFlow reference controller based on their packet handling capacity, by varying the packet size, number of packets and arrival pattern in the IP traffic flows. Distributed internet traffic flow generator (D-ITG) tool has been used to measure the performance in terms of delay, jitter, throughput and packet loss. Our experimentation results show that, FloodLight has the better throughput and less delay when compared to other controllers. This work substantiates the researcher in choosing the appropriate controller for their requirements.
机译:软件定义网络(SDN)是一种集中式网络管理技术,可以减少传统IP网络中的网络管理和策略实施开销。 SDN控制器是负责整个网络操作的网络操作系统。但是,有许多可用的开源控制器,例如NOX,POX,FloodLight和OpenDaylight。每个控制器都有自己的属性,可以支持特定要求。在本文中,我们通过更改数据包大小,数据包数量和IP流量中的到达模式,根据其数据包处理能力对最熟悉的OpenFlow控制器(如NOX,POX,Ryu,FloodLight和OpenFlow参考控制器)的性能进行了比较。 。分布式Internet流量生成器(D-ITG)工具已用于测量延迟,抖动,吞吐量和数据包丢失方面的性能。我们的实验结果表明,与其他控制器相比,FloodLight具有更好的吞吐量和更少的延迟。这项工作证实了研究人员选择适合其要求的控制器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号