...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering >SFGP 2007 - The Effects of Sludge Digester Biogas Recovery on WWTP Ecological Impacts and Exergetic Balance
【24h】

SFGP 2007 - The Effects of Sludge Digester Biogas Recovery on WWTP Ecological Impacts and Exergetic Balance

机译:SFGP 2007-污泥消化池沼气回收对污水处理厂生态影响和能量平衡的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment (ELCA) is applied to a wastewater treatmentnplant (WWTP) by activated sludge in order to demonstrate the environmental andnexergetic effect of biogas recovery within the whole system boundaries. Twonmethods of recovery are compared: a simple burner (Burner scenario) and a combinednheat and power engine (CHP scenario). The results showed that biogasnrecovery reduces the depletion of natural resources and decreases ecological impacts.nEutrophication, toxicity and ecotoxicity impacts are not affected by biogasnrecovery in the Burner scenario and the change is not significant in the CHP scenario.nIrreversibility is added to the system by biogas recovery. This is becausenof the nature of the burnt mixture, which is different from conventional fossil fuelnand because of the addition of units such as CHP and heat exchangers. The CHPnfed with the biogas cannot fulfill the total demand in thermal energy for heatingnand drying in comparison to the burner. Natural gas should be burnt additionallynand a heat exchanger introduced. The irreversibility of the CHP scenario is largernthan the Burner’s one, but the former allows reducing electricity consumption byn22.7%. Moreover, exhaust gas has a positive effect from the exergy point of view.nIt contains an excess potential work which could be recovered in another function.nBased on ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidation, acidification andnmarine aquatic ecotoxicity impacts, biogas recovery with a CHP scenario is betternthan with a Burner scenario. But based on abiotic resources depletion, globalnwarming potential, irreversibility and excess potential work the second strategy,nwith a Burner scenario, is the best one. In process optimization, the focus shouldnnot be only on potential impacts reduction. The decrease of the irreversibilitynproduced by new functions introduced in the system should also be taken into account.nThe other subsystems within the system boundaries should be looked atnespecially those related to electricity production. The ELCA is a useful tool for system ecodesign and for finding the best way to promote renewable fuels versusnfossil ones.
机译:高能生命周期评估(ELCA)通过活性污泥应用于废水处理厂(WWTP),目的是在整个系统范围内证明沼气回收的环境和能效作用。比较了两种恢复方法:简单的燃烧器(Burner方案)和热电联产发动机(CHP方案)。结果表明,沼气回收减少了自然资源的消耗并减少了生态影响。在Burner情景中,富营养化,毒性和生态毒性的影响不受沼气回收的影响,在CHP情景中变化不明显。复苏。这是因为所燃烧的混合物的性质不同于常规的化石燃料,并且是由于添加了诸如CHP和热交换器之类的单元。与燃烧器相比,使用沼气的CHPn不能满足加热和干燥所需的热能总需求。应该另外燃烧天然气,并引入热交换器。 CHP方案的不可逆性大于Burner方案的不可逆性,但前者可以将用电量减少22.7%。此外,从火用角度来看,废气具有积极作用.n它包含可以通过其他功能回收的潜在工作.n基于臭氧层耗竭,光化学氧化,酸化和海蓝藻对水生生态毒性的影响,采用CHP方案回收沼气比Burner场景要好。但是,基于非生物资源的消耗,全球变暖的潜力,不可逆性和潜在的过度潜力,第二种策略(没有Burner情景)是最好的。在过程优化中,重点不应仅在于减少潜在影响。还应考虑系统引入的新功能所产生的不可逆性的降低。n应该特别注意系统边界内的其他子系统,这些子系统与电力生产有关。 ELCA是系统生态设计和寻找促进可再生燃料与化石燃料的最佳方式的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号