首页> 外文期刊>International journal of air-conditioning and refrigeration >MEASURED ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS OF A DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE CONTROL STRATEGIES
【24h】

MEASURED ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS OF A DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM UNDER DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE CONTROL STRATEGIES

机译:不同温度控制策略下的区域供热系统实测能耗分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, the secondary side measured energy consumption of a district heating system (DHS) with different hot water supply temperature control methods was compared. Two control methods were evaluated: an outdoor temperature reset control (OTRC) and an outdoor temperature predictive control (OTPC). While the OTRC strategy has been widely used for energy savings in DHS, the results show that the OTPC strategy resulted in higher energy savings. In general, the OTPC strategy maintained lower supply water temperature, and thereby reduced standby losses and increased overall heat transfer rate to the heated spaces due to higher water mass flow rate to the spaces. During the actual energy consumption monitoring, the OTPC strategy saved about 6.6% more energy compared to that of OTRC strategy. Also, it was found that under partial load conditions, such as during the daytime, the fluctuations in hot water supply temperature with OTRC were more severe than OTPC strategy. Overall, the results showed that the OTPC strategy gave better control and was more stable under full load and partial load conditions.
机译:在本研究中,比较了使用不同的热水供应温度控制方法对区域供热系统(DHS)的次级能耗进行测量。评估了两种控制方法:室外温度重置控制(OTRC)和室外温度预测控制(OTPC)。尽管OTRC策略已被广泛用于DHS的节能中,但结果表明OTPC策略带来了更高的节能效果。通常,OTPC策略可保持较低的供水温度,从而减少待命损失,并由于通向该处所的水的质量流率较高而提高了向受热处所的总传热率。在实际能耗监控中,OTPC策略比OTRC策略节省了约6.6%的能源。此外,还发现在部分负荷条件下,例如白天,使用OTRC进行的热水供应温度波动要比OTPC策略严重得多。总体而言,结果表明OTPC策略可提供更好的控制,并且在满负荷和部分负荷条件下都更稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号