...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology >Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: a case on carton sourcing
【24h】

Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: a case on carton sourcing

机译:使用集成的AHP和背包模型的多个采购决策:纸箱采购案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purchase allocation is a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Multitude of qualitative and quantitative factors is involved in the multiple sourcing decisions. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has widely been used to find out the relative rankings of suppliers. AHP can be combined with regular supplier quantitative audit process. In classical AHP, decision maker (DM) has to pair wise compare suppliers for each factor, whereas the proposed audit based simplified AHP will remove the complexity of comparison. Quarterly audit-based AHP rankings and supplier performance probability products can be used in place of revenues in the backward recursive resource allocation knapsack model. This combined model will decompose purchase allocation problem into different stages and combine one supplier at each stage and provide the optimum and feasible solution in the end. Solution at each stage is also a feasible option. This model is only applicable when the total order quantity and the capacity of all suppliers are integer multiples of economic or minimum order quantity. This integrated model thus provides number of orders/supplier.
机译:购买分配是一个多标准决策(MCDM)问题。定性和定量因素涉及多个采购决策。层次分析法(AHP)已广泛用于查找供应商的相对排名。 AHP可以与常规供应商定量审核流程结合使用。在传统的AHP中,决策者(DM)必须对每个因素进行成对比较供应商,而建议的基于审计的简化AHP将消除比较的复杂性。在后向递归资源分配背包模型中,可以使用基于季度审计的AHP排名和供应商绩效概率产品来代替收入。这种组合模型会将采购分配问题分解为不同的阶段,并在每个阶段合并一个供应商,最终提供最佳可行的解决方案。每个阶段的解决方案也是可行的选择。仅当总订单数量和所有供应商的容量是经济或最小订单数量的整数倍时,此模型才适用。因此,该集成模型提供了订单/供应商的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号