首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives >Analysis of dental shear bond strength tests, shear or tensile?
【24h】

Analysis of dental shear bond strength tests, shear or tensile?

机译:分析牙齿的剪切粘结强度测试,剪切还是拉伸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this research was to investigate dental 'shear' bond strength test methods using a test analogue. It was hypothesized that failure in many traditional dental 'shear' bond strength tests occurred as a consequence of tensile stress induced by the applied bending moment rather than by shear stress. Tensile bond strengths ('maximum' tensile stress to initiate failure) were fairly constant for a wide range of specimen shapes and moment arms, while average shear bond strengths were not. Based on the assumption that failure occurred due to tensile stress, theoretical predictions for failure loads followed experimental results closely. In contrast, the predictions based on the assumption that failure occurred due to shear stress did not. The results suggested that adhesive failure, in many dental 'shear' bond strength tests, does not occur as a consequence of shear stress but as a consequence of tensile stress induced by a bending moment. Therefore, calculation of shear bond strength is inappropriate for these test methods. The results of this investigation and others strongly suggest that dental adhesion researchers should be measuring the stress that initiates debonding rather than average stress.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究使用测试类似物的牙齿“剪切”粘合强度测试方法。据推测,在许多传统的牙科“剪切”粘结强度测试中,由于施加的弯矩而不是剪切应力而引起的拉应力会导致失败。拉伸粘结强度(引发破坏的“最大”拉伸应力)在各种样品形状和弯矩臂中相当恒定,而平均剪切粘结强度则不是。基于失效是由于拉应力而产生的假设,失效载荷的理论预测紧随实验结果。相反,基于剪切应力而导致失效的假设的预测却没有。结果表明,在许多牙科“剪切”粘合强度测试中,粘合力的破坏不是剪切应力的结果,而是弯矩引起的拉伸应力的结果。因此,剪切粘结强度的计算不适用于这些测试方法。这项研究和其他研究的结果强烈表明,牙齿粘着性研究人员应该测量引发脱胶的应力,而不是平均应力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号