【24h】

MATTER OF PRINCIPLE

机译:原则事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Voluntary standards do not have a good reputation in the financial services industry. Generally drafted by the same practitioners that are expected to abide by them, they have been widely criticised for being light-touch without any real teeth, and have been cast as indirectly responsible for the multiple conduct scandals that have come to light in recent years. It may seem surprising, then, that as the burgeoning Green bond market has evolved, its protagonists have put their faith in a short set of voluntary principles as the central mechanism to protect the interests of investors and support the further growth of the market. It is, however, the simplicity and lack of statutory clout that gives the so-called Green Bond Principles (GBP) their inherent value, according to those that drafted them.
机译:自愿性标准在金融服务行业中没有很好的声誉。通常由期望遵守这些原则的从业人员起草,但由于他们轻触而没有任何真实的牙齿而受到广泛批评,并且被认为是间接地导致了近年来曝光的多种行为丑闻的罪魁祸首。因此,随着新兴的绿色债券市场的发展,似乎其令人惊讶,其主人公相信一套短期的自愿原则,将其作为保护投资者利益和支持市场进一步发展的主要机制。然而,起草者认为,正是这种简单和缺乏法定影响力才使所谓的“绿色债券原则”(GBP)具有固有的价值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Financing Review》 |2016年第2131speca期|10-11|共2页
  • 作者

    JOEL CLARK;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:24:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号