首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Response to 'Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends or foes?' In International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics-Stadelmann et al. (2013)
【24h】

Response to 'Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends or foes?' In International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics-Stadelmann et al. (2013)

机译:对“多边适应融资的公平性和成本效益:是朋友还是敌人?”的回应在《国际环境协议:政治,法律和经济学》中,Stadelmann等。 (2013年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The International Environmental Agreements: Politics, law and economics published in its recent issue an article by Stadelmann et al. analysing potential equity and cost-effectiveness criteria for allocating international funding for adaptation to climate change and applying these criteria to decisions made by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board) on project and programme proposals. This commentary is intended to provide some clarification on the decision-making process of the Board as well as correct a number of inaccuracies reported in the article relating to the allocation of the Fund's resources.
机译:Stadelmann等人在最近发行的《国际环境协定:政治,法律和经济学》一书中发表了文章。分析用于分配国际资金以适应气候变化的潜在公平性和成本效益标准,并将这些标准应用于适应基金董事会(理事会)就项目和计划提案做出的决定。该评论旨在澄清董事会的决策过程,并更正与基金资源分配有关的条款中报告的一些错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号