首页> 外文期刊>International environment reporter >Recent Developments Contrast Use Of U.S. Law, Diplomacy to Resolve Disputes
【24h】

Recent Developments Contrast Use Of U.S. Law, Diplomacy to Resolve Disputes

机译:最新动向与使用美国法律,外交解决争端形成鲜明对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent developments related to water resources along the U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico contrast the application of U.S. law to address international environmental concerns with the use of diplomacy, attorneys at the 31st annual American Bar Association Water Law Conference said June 7. Paul Dayton, of Short Cressman & Burgess, explored the extraterritorial application of U.S. law to a cross-boundary polluter, in this case a Canadian smelter that discharged a slag that settled as zinc, lead, cadmium, and other heavy metals into the Columbia River in the United States. A federal district court found Teck Metals Ltd. liable for cleanup costs linked to illegal discharges of slag and effluent into the Upper Columbia River for more than 60 years (Pakootas v. Teck Com-inco Metals, E.D. Wash., No. 04-CV-256, 12/14/12). Generally, applying U.S. law outside U.S. borders requires the consent of the country in which it would be imposed.
机译:6月7日,美国律师协会第31届年度水法会议的律师说,与美国,加拿大和墨西哥接壤的边境地区的水资源有关的最新发展与美国通过外交手段解决国际环境问题的适用形成鲜明对比。 Short Cressman&Burgess探索了美国法律对跨境污染者的域外适用,在本例中为加拿大冶炼厂,该冶炼厂将沉积为锌,铅,镉和其他重金属的炉渣排入了美国的哥伦比亚河。 。联邦地方法院裁定,Teck Metals Ltd.对超过60年的非法排渣和废水排入上哥伦比亚河的清理费用负有责任(Pakootas诉Teck Com-inco Metals,ED Wash。,第04-CV号) -256、12 / 14/12)。通常,在美国境外适用美国法律需要获得实施该法律的国家的同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号