首页> 外文期刊>International development planning review >Scholarship and policy on urban densification: perspectives from city experiences
【24h】

Scholarship and policy on urban densification: perspectives from city experiences

机译:城市致密化奖学金和政策:城市体验的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Urban compaction and densification policy is widely advocated internationally, including for countries in the global South. Such advocacy draws on ‘best practice’ case examples, but these are frequently presented in decontextualised ways. Drawing from an account of densification processes and policies in six cities – Moscow, Curitiba, Sydney, Johannesburg, Delhi and São Paulo – the paper shows that while policy is sometimes similar, outcomes are deeply embedded in national and local contexts and are therefore variable and complex. In the polarised debate between compaction and managed sprawl, the fact is often missed that both sprawl and densification are happening simultaneously in most cities. Analysis of the cases also suggests that insufficient attention has been paid within both the analytical and policy literature to the influence of property markets and associated politics, the role of informality, and how politics and institutions shape the outcomes of compaction policy, including the agency of local people.
机译:城市压实和致密化政策在国际上广泛倡导,包括全球南部的国家。此类宣传借鉴了“最佳实践”案例,但这些常规是以义务化方式呈现的。从六个城市的致密化进程和政策绘制 - 莫斯科,库里提巴,悉尼,约翰内斯堡,德里和圣保罗 - 论文显示,虽然政策有时是相似的,但结果深入嵌入国家和本地环境中,因此是可变的复杂的。在压实和管理蔓延之间的极化辩论中,往往错过了大多数城市的同时发生蔓延和致密化。对案件的分析还表明,在房地产市场和相关政治影响的分析和政策文献中,对非正式性的作用以及政治和机构如何塑造包括原子能机构的结果的分析和政策文献中的注意力不足。当地人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号