...
首页> 外文期刊>International association of theoretical and applied limnoloy >High and low flow nitrate distribution and its implications for nitrate retention in Navigation Pool 8, Upper Mississippi River (UMR), and in a high-nitrate tributary, the Root River, USA
【24h】

High and low flow nitrate distribution and its implications for nitrate retention in Navigation Pool 8, Upper Mississippi River (UMR), and in a high-nitrate tributary, the Root River, USA

机译:密西西比河上游(UMR)导航池8和高根河支流美国罗特河中硝酸盐的高低流量分布及其对硝酸盐滞留的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Excessive nitrate transport from large, agriculturally-dominated watersheds to estuaries and coastal waters is an emerging national (USA; Howarth et al. 1996) and global problem. In the United States high nitrate transport from the Mississippi River has been implicated in development of a large hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico (Goolsby et al. 2001, Rabalais et al. 2002). The primary nitrate source (~40%) is the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB), defined as the upstream portion of the watershed north of Cairo, Illinois (Strauss et al. 2004, Richardson et al. 2004). Statistical modeling (Alexander et al. 2000) predicts a high potential for nitrate retention in low-order streams. Of the various fates, denitrification, the reduction of nitrate to dinitrogen gas, is most effective, since loss to the atmosphere is a permanent sink. Numerous literature reports confirm high N retention in low-order streams (e.g. Peterson et al. 2001). However, some recent small stream studies in the UMRB indicate a limited ability for low-order agricultural streams to impact long term loads, despite high denitrification potential (Bolke et al. 2004, Royer et al. 2004; Schaller et al. 2004). On the other hand, some large river reaches, generally considered nutrient conduits, may be more effective nitrate sinks than previously expected. Navigation Pool 8, UMRB, is one example of a large river sink for nitrate (Richardson et al. 2004, D. Soballe and D. Wasley, pers. comm.). Seasonally, the greatest potential for processing N mass is during late spring, high flow. At other seasons, especially late fall through early spring, mass retention is low due to lower loads, concentrations and temperature. Our primary objective was to examine nitrate distribution in a highly complex, large river channel during spring high flow when input exceeds output, and in late summer when nitrate transport is more conservative. A second objective was to identify po- tential retention mechanisms by comparing and contrasting physical-chemical properties from a range of surface water and pore water environments, including a large tributary, the Root River.
机译:从大型的,以农业为主的流域到河口和沿海水域的硝酸盐过量运输是一个新兴的国家(美国; Howarth等,1996),也是一个全球性问题。在美国,来自密西西比河的高硝酸盐运移与墨西哥湾大缺氧区的发展有关(Goolsby等,2001; Rabalais等,2002)。硝酸盐的主要来源(〜40%)是密西西比河上游流域(UMRB),被定义为伊利诺伊州开罗以北流域的上游部分(Strauss等,2004; Richardson等,2004)。统计模型(Alexander等,2000)预测低位流中硝酸盐保留的潜力很大。在各种命运中,反硝化(将硝酸盐还原为二氮气)是最有效的方法,因为向大气的损失是一个永久性的沉没。大量文献报道证实低阶流中氮的保留较高(例如Peterson等,2001)。但是,最近在UMRB中进行的一些小溪研究表明,尽管反硝化潜力很高,但低阶农业溪流影响长期负荷的能力有限(Bolke等,2004; Royer等,2004; Schaller等,2004)。另一方面,一些通常认为是营养管道的大河段可能比以前预期的更有效的硝酸盐汇。 UMRB导航池8是大型硝酸盐河汇的一个例子(Richardson等,2004,D。Soballe和D. Wasley,pers。comm。)。季节性地,处理N质的最大潜力是在春末高流量期间。在其他季节,尤其是秋天到春末,由于较低的负荷,浓度和温度,质量保持率很低。我们的主要目标是在投入大于产出的春季高流量期间和夏季末硝酸盐运输更为保守的情况下研究高度复杂的大型河道中的硝酸盐分布。第二个目标是通过比较和对比一系列地表水和孔隙水环境(包括大型支流罗特河)的物理化学特性来确定潜在的保留机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号