首页> 外文期刊>Inter-Asia Cultural Studies >Asian American studies in travel
【24h】

Asian American studies in travel

机译:亚裔美国人旅行研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This short essay situates this journal's special issue within the Cold War history and politics of transpacific knowledge formation by calling on Edward W. Said's concept of ‘traveling theory.’ Contributors to this groundbreaking collective project have shown us that Asian American critique interfaced with Asia can upset the discipline's boundary and its assumptions enough to generate new questions and objects of inquiry. At the same time, a discipline's travel necessarily accompanies and (re)institutes troubling apparatuses of knowledge and power. Of particular concern here are the two elements that largely set the discursive parameters of Asian American studies as they have been institutionalized in the United States: liberal multiculturalism and the ethno-national organization of knowledge. Also integral to the area studies formations, they have together served as a powerful epistemic tool for the US-led Cold War geopolitical management of the post-Second World War, postcolonial world. What are the consequences of traveling knowledge uncritical of such earlier history? The essay suggests that the inter-Asia, transpacific critique and its historical materialist interrogation of the Cold War legacies in Asia should remain urgent if we were to sustain the productively unsettling effects of Asian American studies' travel to Asia.View full textDownload full textKeywordsTraveling Theory, Cold War, postcolonial, neocolonial, transpacific, politics of knowledge, area studies, Asian American studiesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2012.659815
机译:这篇短文通过呼吁爱德华·W·赛义德(Edward W. Said)的“旅行理论”概念,将本期刊的特刊置于冷战历史和跨太平洋知识形成的政治之内。对此开创性的集体项目的贡献者向我们展示了亚裔美国人的批评与亚洲的联系可以破坏该学科的边界及其假设,足以产生新的问题和探究对象。同时,一门学科的旅行必定伴随着(或重新建立)令人不安的知识和力量。这里尤为令人关注的是,在美国已经将亚裔美国人研究制度化的两个因素,它们在很大程度上设定了它们的话语参数:自由多元文化主义和知识的民族民族组织。它们也是区域研究机构不可或缺的组成部分,共同为美国领导的第二次世界大战后,后殖民世界的冷战地缘政治管理提供了强有力的认识工具。不了解这样的早期历史的旅行知识会带来什么后果?这篇文章认为,如果我们要维持亚裔美国人研究前往亚洲的生产性令人不安的影响,那么亚洲间,跨太平洋的批评及其对亚洲冷战遗产的历史唯物主义审讯应该仍然是紧迫的。查看全文下载全文,冷战,后殖民地,新殖民地,跨太平洋地区,知识政治,区域研究,亚裔美国人研究。 stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2012.659815

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号