首页> 外文期刊>Intelligent automation and soft computing >Aumann Shapley Method for Congestion Cost Allocation in Multilateral Transactions Framework of Restructured Power Market
【24h】

Aumann Shapley Method for Congestion Cost Allocation in Multilateral Transactions Framework of Restructured Power Market

机译:重组电力市场多边交易框架中Aumann Shapley方法的拥堵成本分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Deregulation of Electricity market has not only led to increase in competition among generators, but also reduced electricity prices. It has introduced several issues in the market; two of them are congestion management and market power. Due to open transmission access all the participants have equal right to access transmission network. However, they have to bear the costs incurred to accommodate their transaction. The cost allocation is still a problem to be tackled efficiently. The prevailing problem is how to allocate the congestion cost among the market participants. An efficient and fair allocation of congestion cost would result in smooth operation of transmission system. It also helps in tackling congestion and market power. This paper proposes a novel approach using Aumann Shapley (AS) method of game theory for congestion cost allocation in a deregulated electricity market. The results obtained using proposed method are compared with uplift and nodal pricing methods for IEEE 14 bus system, New England 39 bus system and 75 bus Indian power system (practical data). This comparison illustrates the pros and cons of each method.
机译:电力市场放松管制不仅导致发电机之间的竞争加剧,而且降低了电价。它在市场上引入了一些问题;其中两个是拥塞管理和市场支配力。由于开放的传输访问,所有参与者都具有访问传输网络的平等权利。但是,他们必须承担为适应交易而发生的费用。成本分配仍然是有效解决的问题。普遍存在的问题是如何在市场参与者之间分配拥堵成本。拥塞成本的有效和公平分配将导致传输系统的平稳运行。它还有助于解决拥堵和市场支配力。本文提出了一种使用博弈论的Aumann Shapley(AS)方法进行管制的电力市场中拥塞成本分配的新方法。使用提议的方法获得的结果与IEEE 14总线系统,新英格兰39总线系统和75总线印度电力系统的提升和节点定价方法进行了比较(实用数据)。这种比较说明了每种方法的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号