首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Decisions >(1) L'Oreal SA (2) Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie (3) Laboratoire Gamier & Cie (4) L'Oreal (UK) Ltd v (1) eBay International Ag (2) eBay Europe SARL (3) eBay (UK) Ltd (4) Stephen Potts (5) Tracy Ratchford (6) Marie Ormsby (7) James Clarke (8) Joanna Clarke (9) Glen Fox (10) Rukhsana Bi
【24h】

(1) L'Oreal SA (2) Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie (3) Laboratoire Gamier & Cie (4) L'Oreal (UK) Ltd v (1) eBay International Ag (2) eBay Europe SARL (3) eBay (UK) Ltd (4) Stephen Potts (5) Tracy Ratchford (6) Marie Ormsby (7) James Clarke (8) Joanna Clarke (9) Glen Fox (10) Rukhsana Bi

机译:(1)欧莱雅(2)Lancome Parfums et Beaute&Cie(3)Laboratoire Gamier&Cie(4)欧莱雅(英国)有限公司(1)eBay International Ag(2)eBay Europe SARL(3)eBay (UK)Ltd(4)Stephen Potts(5)Tracy Ratchford(6)Marie Ormsby(7)James Clarke(8)Joanna Clarke(9)Glen Fox(10)Rukhsana Bi

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The essential questions were:rn(1) whether eBay Europe were liable for trademark infringements carried out by their users; andrn(2) whether eBay Europe themselves committed infringements by using trademarks in relation to infringing goods.rnThis was a test case brought by L'Oreal, one of a number around Europe, including L'Oreal SA v eBay France SA, Case RG 07/11365 in which the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris gave judgment on 13 May 2009. Other brand owners had brought similar claims against eBay Europe and other providers. L'Oreal had settled with the fourth to eighth defendants and had obtained judgment against the ninth and tenth.
机译:基本问题是:(1)eBay欧洲是否应对其用户实施的商标侵权行为负责; (2)eBay欧洲本身是否通过使用商标来与侵权商品有关而实施侵权。rn这是欧莱雅公司(欧洲多个国家之一)提起的测试案例,其中包括欧莱雅公司诉eBay法国SA案,案例RG 07 / 11365,巴黎大审法院于2009年5月13日作出判决。其他品牌所有者也对eBay Europe和其他提供商提出了类似的要求。欧莱雅与第四至第八被告达成和解,并获得了对第九和第十名的判决。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intellectual Property Decisions》 |2009年第7期|8-15|共8页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号