首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Decisions >Sleaze and desist - law firm's letter threats backfire
【24h】

Sleaze and desist - law firm's letter threats backfire

机译:停滞不前-律师事务所的信威胁适得其反

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Wrongly Accused 66 received a letter last year. It was from a law firm called ACS: Law accusing WronglyAccusedof having illegallydownloaded UK Student House - a pornographic film. The firm claimed to represent a company called Media CAT which owned the copyright to the film, and demanded £475 in compensation. Ignoring that letter, several months later, WronglyAccused received another, this time from a company called GCB Ltd. The letter laid out the same accusation and demanded the same payment.
机译:错误指控66去年收到了一封信。它来自一家名为ACS的律师事务所:法律指控WronglyAccuseded非法下载了色情影片UK Student House。该公司声称代表一家名为Media CAT的公司,该公司拥有该电影的版权,并要求赔偿475英镑。几个月后,WronglyAccused忽略了这封信,这一次是从一家名为GCB Ltd的公司收到的。这封信提出了相同的指控,并要求支付相同的款项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号