首页> 外文期刊>Integrated environmental assessment and management >Safeguarding the Provision of Ecosystem Services in Catchment Systems
【24h】

Safeguarding the Provision of Ecosystem Services in Catchment Systems

机译:保障集水系统中的生态系统服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A narrow technocentric focus on a few favored ecosystem services (generally provisioning services) has led to ecosystem degradation globally, including catchment systems and their capacities to support human well-being. Increasing recognition of the multiple benefits provided by ecosystems is slowly being translated into policy and some areas of practice, although there remains a significant shortfall in the incorporation of a systemic perspective into operation management and decision-making tools. Nevertheless, a range of ecosystem-based solutions to issues as diverse as flooding and green space provision in the urban environment offers hope for improving habitat and optimization of beneficial services. The value of catchment ecosystem processes and their associated services is also being increasingly recognized and internalized by the water industry, improving water quality and quantity through catchment land management rather than at greater expense in the treatment costs of contaminated water ed lower in catchments. Parallel recognition of the value of working with natural processes, rather than "defending" built assets when catchment hydrology is adversely affected by unsympathetic upstream development, is being progressively incorporated into flood risk management policy. This focus on wider catchment processes also yields a range of cobenefits for fishery, wildlife, amenity, flood risk, and other interests, which may be optimized if multiple stakeholders and their diverse value systems are included in decision-making processes. Ecosystem services, particularly implemented as a central element of the ecosystem approach, provide an integrated framework for building in these different perspectives and values, many of them formerly excluded, into commercial and resource management decision-making processes, thereby making tractable the integrative aspirations of sustainable development. This can help redress deeply entrenched inherited assumptions, habits, and vested interests, replacing them in many management situations with wider recognition of the multiple values of ecosystems and their services. Global interest in taking an ecosystem approach is promoting novel scientific and policy thinking, yet there is a shortfall in its translation into practical management tools. Professional associations may have key roles to play in breaking down barriers to the "mainstreaming" of systemic perspectives into common practice, particularly through joining u different sectors of society essential to their implementation and ongoing adaptive management.
机译:以技术为中心的狭narrow性关注少数几个偏爱的生态系统服务(通常是供应服务)已导致全球生态系统退化,包括集水系统及其支持人类福祉的能力。人们日益认识到,生态系统所带来的多重利益正在逐步转化为政策和某些实践领域,尽管在将系统观点纳入运营管理和决策工具方面仍然存在很大不足。然而,针对生态系统中各种问题的一系列基于生态系统的解决方案为城市环境中的洪水和绿地提供提供了改善居住环境和优化有益服务的希望。流域生态系统过程及其相关服务的价值也越来越受到水行业的认可和内化,它通过流域土地管理来改善水质和水量,而不是在流域较低的受污染水处理成本上付出更大的代价。当流域水文受到上游的无情发展不利影响时,对自然过程工作价值的并行认可,而不是“保护”已建资产,已逐渐纳入洪水风险管理政策中。对更广泛的集水过程的关注也为渔业,野生动植物,康乐设施,洪水风险和其他利益带来了一系列的共同利益,如果在决策过程中包括多个利益相关者及其多样化的价值体系,这些利益将得到优化。生态系统服务,特别是作为生态系统方法的核心要素而实施的服务,提供了一个综合框架,用于将这些不同的观点和价值观建立在商业和资源管理的决策过程中,这些观点和价值观以前曾被排除在外,从而使其易于实现。可持续发展。这可以帮助纠正根深蒂固的继承假设,习惯和既得利益,在许多管理情况下将其替换为对生态系统及其服务的多重价值的广泛认可。全球对采用生态系统方法的兴趣正在促进新颖的科学和政策思维,但是将其转化为实用的管理工具尚有不足。专业协会在打破将系统性观点“主流化”成为普遍实践的障碍方面可能发挥关键作用,特别是通过加入对实现和持续进行适应性管理至关重要的不同社会阶层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号