首页> 外文期刊>Innovative Infrastructure Solutions >Comparison of strength and durability properties between earth‑cement blocks and cement–sand blocks
【24h】

Comparison of strength and durability properties between earth‑cement blocks and cement–sand blocks

机译:水泥砂块与水泥砂块的强度和耐久性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years, due to the growth of the construction industry in Sri Lanka, the consumption of river sand has increased.Because of overexploitation of river sand and its various harmful environmental and social consequences, sand mining islimited by authorities, and therefore, there is a scarcity for good quality river sand at a reasonable cost. As a result, localsoil is used for the production of masonry units as sand replacement material. In this study, to compare the performance ofcement–sand blocks (CSBs) and earth-cement blocks (ECBs), three different cement:sand and cement:local soil mix ratioswere considered for CSBs and ECBs, respectively. An experimental program was carried out to determine the physical,strength and durability characteristics of both block types. The results show that ECBs performed better in dry compressivestrength and most of the durability characteristics. However, strength reduction due to wet conditions is a major issue forECBs.
机译:近年来,由于斯里兰卡建筑业的发展,河砂的消耗量增加了。由于河砂的过度开采及其各种有害的环境和社会后果,导致采砂受到当局的限制,因此缺乏合理价格的优质河沙的短缺。结果,局部土壤被用于生产砖石单元作为砂的替代材料。在这项研究中,为了比较水泥砂块(CSBs)和土水泥块(ECBs)的性能,分别考虑了CSBs和ECBs三种不同的水泥:砂土和水泥:当地土壤混合比。进行了实验程序以确定这两种块体的物理,强度和耐久性特征。结果表明,欧洲央行在干抗压强度和大多数耐久性特征方面表现更好。然而,由于潮湿条件导致的强度降低是ECB的主要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号