首页> 外文期刊>Informing science >Citizen Science and Biomedical Research: Implications for Bioethics Theory and Practice
【24h】

Citizen Science and Biomedical Research: Implications for Bioethics Theory and Practice

机译:公民科学与生物医学研究:对生物伦理​​学理论与实践的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Certain trends in scientific research have important relevance to bioethics theory and practice. A growing stream of literature relates to increasing transparency and inclusivity of populations (stakeholders) in scientific research, from high volume data collection, synthesis, and analysis to verification and ethical scrutiny. The emergence of this stream of literature has implications for bioethics theory and practice. This paper seeks to make explicit these streams of literature and to relate these to bioethical issues, through consideration of certain extreme examples of scientific research where bioethical engagement is vital. Implications for theory and practice are derived, offering useful insights derived from multidisciplinary theory. Arguably, rapidly developing fields of citizen science such as informing science and others seeking to maximise stakeholder involvement in both research and bioethical engagement have emerged as a response to these types of issues; radically enhanced stakeholder engagement in science may herald a new maximally inclusive and transparent paradigm in bioethics based on lessons gained from exposure to increasingly uncertain ethical contexts of biomedical research.
机译:科学研究的某些趋势与生物伦理学理论和实践有着重要的联系。越来越多的文献涉及从大量数据收集,合成和分析到验证和道德审查的科学研究中,人口(利益相关者)的透明度和包容性不断提高。这类文学的出现对生物伦理​​学的理论和实践产生了影响。本文试图通过考虑某些对生物伦理​​参与至关重要的科学研究的极端例子,使这些文献流更加明确,并将其与生物伦理问题联系起来。得出了对理论和实践的启示,提供了从多学科理论中得出的有用见解。可以说,作为对这些类型问题的回应,已经出现了迅速发展的公民科学领域,例如通知科学和寻求最大限度地让利益相关者参与研究和生物伦理参与的领域。利益相关者对科学的极大参与可能会基于从暴露于日益不确定的生物医学研究伦理环境中获得的教训,预示着一种新的,具有最大包容性和透明性的生物伦理学范式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号