...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Systems Research >Pricing of Wireless Services: Service Pricing vs. Traffic Pricing
【24h】

Pricing of Wireless Services: Service Pricing vs. Traffic Pricing

机译:无线服务的定价:服务定价与流量定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As the ability to measure technology resource usage gets easier with increased connectivity, the question whether a technology resource should be priced by the amount of the resource used or by the particular use of the resource has become increasingly important. We examine this issue in the context of pricing of wireless services: should the price be based on the service, e.g., voice, multimedia messages, short messages, or should it be based on the traffic generated? Many consumer advocates oppose discriminatory pricing across services believing that it enriches carriers at the expense of consumers. The opposition to discrimination has grown significantly, and it has even prompted the U.S. Congress to question executives of some of the biggest carriers. With this ongoing debate on discrimination in mind, we compare two pricing regimes here. One regime, namely, service pricing, involves pricing different services differently. The other one, namely, traffic pricing, involves pricing the traffic (i.e., bytes) transmitted. We show why the common wisdom, that discriminatory pricing across services increases profits and harms consumers, may not always hold. We also show that such discrimination can increase social welfare.
机译:随着连接性的提高,衡量技术资源使用情况的能力变得越来越容易,对技术资源应按所用资源的数量还是对资源的特定使用进行定价的问题变得越来越重要。我们在无线服务定价的背景下研究此问题:价格应基于服务,例如语音,彩信,短消息,还是应基于产生的流量?许多消费者权益倡导者反对跨服务的歧视性定价,认为这会以牺牲消费者的利益来丰富运营商。对歧视的反对已经大大增加,甚至促使美国国会质疑一些最大航空公司的高管。考虑到正在进行的关于歧视的辩论,我们在这里比较两种定价制度。一种机制,即服务定价,涉及对不同服务进行不同定价。另一个,即流量定价,涉及对传输的流量(即字节)进行定价。我们证明了为什么通常的观点可能并不总是成立,即人们普遍认为,跨服务的歧视性定价会增加利润并损害消费者。我们还表明,这种歧视可以增加社会福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号