...
首页> 外文期刊>Information & Management >The strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource: Do switching costs matter?
【24h】

The strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource: Do switching costs matter?

机译:继续外包,转换供应商或外包的战略选择:转换成本重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IT outsourcing contracts are often discontinued in favor of other alternatives (returning to in-house development, or switching to another vendor). Switching costs are experienced when terminating a business relationship and securing an alternative. We tried to answer the question: do switching costs matter significantly in the strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource? Switching costs were considered, such as those due to IT operations (sunk investment, lost performance, system upgrades, uncertainty, and induction-retraining-performance), personnel-replacement costs (candidate search, and IT/setup), and in-house learning (cognitive/behavioral learning). A field survey was conducted, and, for each of these cost types, the differences between group means across the three groups (outsourcing continuation, vendor switching, and backsourcing) were determined. The findings suggested that customer organizations preferred outsourcing continuation most and backsourcing least when their switching costs were high. However, the relative preference for vendor switching depended on the switching cost type.
机译:IT外包合同通常会终止,转而使用其他替代方案(返回内部开发,或切换到其他供应商)。在终止业务关系并确保替代方案时会经历转换成本。我们试图回答以下问题:在继续外包,更换供应商或外包的战略选择中,转换成本是否重要?考虑了转换成本,例如由于IT运营(沉没的投资,失去的性能,系统升级,不确定性和上岗再培训的性能),人员更换成本(候选人搜索和IT /设置)以及内部成本学习(认知/行为学习)。进行了实地调查,对于每种成本类型,确定了三个组之间的组均值之间的差异(外包持续,供应商转换和外包)。调查结果表明,当客户的转换成本很高时,客户组织更喜欢外包延续,而最不喜欢外包。但是,供应商转换的相对偏好取决于转换成本类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号