...
首页> 外文期刊>Information, Knowledge, Systems Management 1389-1995 >Non-causal versus causal qualitative modelling and simulation
【24h】

Non-causal versus causal qualitative modelling and simulation

机译:非因果与因果定性建模和仿真

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Qualitative models of dynamical systems fall into noncausal or causal approaches. The noncausal approach is widely used in part because traditional physics describes phenomena by means of symmetric functional relations. It supports the idea that causality can be ignored or inferred from the model itself. Nevertheless, when people explain how things work, they use causal relations. Representing causality explicitly makes it possible to take advantage of exogenous knowledge necessary for understanding the phenomena and supporting self-explanatory simulation. The basic concepts used in both approaches, in addition to the representation formalisms and algorithms, are discussed.
机译:动力系统的定性模型属于非因果关系或因果关系方法。非因果方法之所以被广泛使用,部分原因是传统物理学通过对称的函数关系描述现象。它支持因果关系可以从模型本身忽略或推断的想法。然而,当人们解释事物如何运作时,他们使用因果关系。明确表示因果关系使得可以利用必要的外来知识来理解现象并支持自我解释模拟。除了表示形式主义和算法之外,还讨论了两种方法中使用的基本概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号