首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >'Social media logic' meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians
【24h】

'Social media logic' meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians

机译:“社交媒体逻辑”符合专业规范:Twitter标记新闻工作者和政客的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social media is characterized by a set of principles defined as 'social media logic' [van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 7, 2-14. doi:10.12924/ mac2013.01010002], derived from the theory of 'media logic' developed in the era of mass media [Altheide, D. L, & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. London: Sage.]. This article explores how 'social media logic' impacts on two interconnected but yet distinct professions, journalism and politics, by analysing one of the key principles of social media logics, namely 'connectivity', an advanced strategy of algorithmically connecting users to content and other users in social media [van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 7, 2-14. doi:10.12924/mac2013.01010002]. The operationalization of connectedness in this study is the Twitter hashtag, as it is the most common feature for users to connect and relate to within a larger networked discourse [Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13-27). New York, NY: Peter Lang.]. The empirical material consists of tweets posted by 10 Norwegian politicians and 10 journalists, selected on their level of activity on Twitter. The tweets are analysed with the emphasis on the frequency and content of the hashtags, and the methodological design is comparative between the journalists and the politicians. A key finding is that there are significant differences between how journalists and politicians use hashtags, but that they both use mass media hashtags to reach outside their follower networks. Consequently, this demonstrates that journalists' and politicians' use of social media is closely connected to their professional norms, and that the 'social media logic' is still related to the 'media logic' of mainstream and broadcast media.
机译:社交媒体的特征是被定义为“社交媒体逻辑”的一组原则[van Dijck,J.&Poell,T.(2013)。了解社交媒体逻辑。媒体与传播,7,2-14。 doi:10.12924 / mac2013.01010002],源于大众媒体时代发展的“媒体逻辑”理论[Altheide,D. L,&Snow,R. P.(1979)。媒体逻辑。伦敦:圣人。]。本文通过分析社交媒体逻辑的一项关键原则,即“连接性”(一种通过算法将用户连接到内容和其他内容的高级策略),探讨“社交媒体逻辑”如何对两个相互联系但又截然不同的专业(新闻学和政治学)产生影响。社交媒体中的用户[van Dijck,J.&Poell,T.(2013)。了解社交媒体逻辑。媒体与传播,7,2-14。 doi:10.12924 / mac2013.01010002]。在这项研究中,连接性的可操作性是Twitter的标签,因为它是用户在较大的网络话语中进行连接和关联的最常见功能[Bruns,A.,&Burgess,J.(2015)。 Twitter的标签,从即席到已计算的公众。在N. Rambukkana(Ed。),Hashtag的公众:话语网络的力量和政治(pp。13-27)。纽约,纽约:彼得·朗(Peter Lang)。经验材料包括10位挪威政客和10位记者在Twitter上的活动水平选择的推文。分析了这些推文,重点是主题标签的频率和内容,并且在新闻工作者和政治人物之间比较了方法设计。一个关键发现是记者和政治人物使用标签的方式之间存在显着差异,但是他们俩都使用大众媒体标签来到达其追随者网络之外。因此,这表明记者和政客对社交媒体的使用与他们的职业规范紧密相关,并且“社交媒体逻辑”仍与主流媒体和广播媒体的“媒体逻辑”有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号