首页> 外文期刊>Info >Digital inclusion and user (dis)empowerment: a critical perspective
【24h】

Digital inclusion and user (dis)empowerment: a critical perspective

机译:数字包容性和用户(非)授权:批判性观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This article aims to highlight the main limitations of the emancipatory potentials of digital inclusion policies and information and communication technologies (ICTs). Increasingly, empowerment is put forward as one of the main goals of digital inclusion. By applying user-centric and participatory approaches, assumptions are made that individuals will be empowered and, as such, will be re-included in society. Design/methodology/approach - These assumptions, however, tend to ignore the social, economic, political and technical conditions within which individual choices are made and within which individuals must inevitably act. Instead of attempting to narrow the existing social gap between class-divided societies, and of probing the limitations given at the macro-level by questioning the wider social structure, digital inclusion policies tend to individualize problems that are in fact social in their nature. Findings - This contribution will, therefore, aim to identify the key causes of structural (dis)empowerment and how these resonate to digital inclusion. The article positions itself within the political economy of communication research tradition and aims to confront the structural consequences of social inequalities, existing social hierarchies and power structures against mechanisms of digital inequalities and against the implementation of digital inclusion policies. Originality/value - By proceeding from a critical perspective, it aims to demonstrate the limitations of user-centric and micro-level approaches, while questioning their normative interpretations of digital empowerment which tend to be reductionist in their essence and instrumental in their aims.
机译:目的-本文旨在强调数字包容性政策以及信息和通信技术(ICT)的解放潜力的主要局限性。越来越多地将授权作为数字包容性的主要目标之一。通过采用以用户为中心和参与性的方法,可以假定个人将被赋权,因此将被重新纳入社会。设计/方法/方法-但是,这些假设倾向于忽略做出个人选择以及个人必须不可避免地采取行动的社会,经济,政治和技术条件。数字包容性政策不是试图缩小阶级划分的社会之间现有的社会鸿沟,而是通过质疑更广泛的社会结构来探索宏观层面上的局限性,而是倾向于对实际上是社会性质的问题进行个体化。调查结果-因此,这项贡献旨在确定结构性(取消)授权的关键原因,以及这些原因如何引起数字包容。本文将自己置于传播研究传统的政治经济学之内,旨在针对数字不平等机制和数字包容政策的实施,面对社会不平等,现有社会等级制度和权力结构的结构性后果。原创性/价值-从批判性的角度出发,它旨在证明以用户为中心和微观层面的方法的局限性,同时质疑其对数字授权的规范性解释,这些规范化解释在本质上往往是简化主义者,而在目标上却起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号