首页> 外文期刊>Industrial relations journal >The Ghent effect for whom? Mapping the variations of the Ghent effect across different trade unions in Denmark
【24h】

The Ghent effect for whom? Mapping the variations of the Ghent effect across different trade unions in Denmark

机译:对谁的根特效应?绘制丹麦不同工会之间根特效应的变化图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The presence of an unemployment insurance system based on voluntary membership in unemployment insurance funds (known as the 'Ghent system') and a high union density has long been known and well documented, and even referred to as a special 'Ghent effect'. However the Ghent system, especially in the three classic Ghent countries, Finland, Sweden and Denmark, has come under significant pressure in recent years, and many researchers are referring to an erosion of the Ghent system as a recruiting mechanism for trade unions. But prior research aimed at documenting the Ghent effect seems to disregard variations in how strongly trade unions benefit from the Ghent system as a recruiting mechanism. Hence, this article sets out to investigate whether all trade unions equally benefit from a Ghent effect across different sectors and occupations by studying the Danish case. Unique survey data made it possible to map Danish wage earners' reasons for joining or leaving unemployment insurance funds and trade unions. The article finds that there are great variations among Danish trade unions in terms of how strongly they are dependent on a Ghent effect as a recruiting mechanism. We may expect the same variations in the two other Ghent countries, Sweden and Finland, because the organisation of the Ghent system is similar in the three Nordic countries. In addition, the article shows that this variation might help explain why some trade unions are on the rise to the detriment of others.
机译:长期以来,基于失业保险基金自愿加入的失业保险制度(称为“根特制度”)和高工会密度的存在早已为人所知并得到充分证明,甚至被称为特殊的“根特效应”。但是,根特体系,特别是在三个经典的根特国家(芬兰,瑞典和丹麦)近年来承受着巨大的压力,许多研究人员将根特体系的侵蚀称为工会的招聘机制。但是,以前旨在记录根特效应的研究似乎忽略了工会从根特体系作为招募机制中受益的程度的差异。因此,本文着手通过研究丹麦的案例,调查所有工会是否同样受益于不同部门和职业的根特效应。独特的调查数据可以绘制丹麦工薪阶层加入或退出失业保险基金和工会的原因。该文章发现,丹麦工会在很大程度上取决于根特效应作为一种招聘机制,在丹麦工会之间存在很大差异。我们可能会期望在另外两个根特国家(瑞典和芬兰)中出现相同的变化,因为在三个北欧国家中,根特体系的组织方式是相似的。此外,该文章还表明,这种差异可能有助于解释为什么某些工会正在崛起而损害其他工会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Industrial relations journal》 |2014年第6期|469-485|共17页
  • 作者

    Laust Hogedahl;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science, Aalborg University, Fibigerstraede 1, Aalborg O DK-9220, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号