首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on >TDMA Versus CSMA/CA for Wireless Multihop Communications: A Stochastic Worst-Case Delay Analysis
【24h】

TDMA Versus CSMA/CA for Wireless Multihop Communications: A Stochastic Worst-Case Delay Analysis

机译:用于无线多跳通信的TDMA与CSMA / CA:随机最坏情况延迟分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Wireless networks have become a very attractive solution for soft real-time data transport in the industry. For such technologies to carry real-time traffic, reliable bounds on end-to-end communication delays have to be ascertained to warrant a proper system behavior. As for legacy wired embedded and real-time networks, two main wireless multiple access methods can be leveraged: one is time division multiple access (TDMA), which follows a time-triggered paradigm, and the other is carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA), which follows an event-triggered paradigm. This paper proposes an analytical comparison of the time behavior of two representative TDMA and CSMA/CA protocols in terms of the worst-case end-to-end delay. This worst-case delay is expressed in a probabilistic manner because our analytical framework captures the versatility of the wireless medium. Analytical delay bounds are obtained from delay distributions, which are compared to fine-grained simulation results. Exhibited study cases show that TDMA can offer smaller or larger worst-case bounds than CSMA/CA depending on its settings.
机译:无线网络已成为业界软实时数据传输的非常有吸引力的解决方案。为了使此类技术能够传输实时流量,必须确定端到端通信延迟的可靠界限,以保证适当的系统行为。对于传统的有线嵌入式和实时网络,可以利用两种主要的无线多路访问方法:一种是时分多路访问(TDMA),它遵循时间触发的范式,另一种是载波侦听多路访问并避免冲突(CSMA / CA),它遵循事件触发的范例。本文针对最坏情况的端到端延迟提出了两种代表性TDMA和CSMA / CA协议的时间行为的分析比较。这种最坏情况的延迟以概率方式表示,因为我们的分析框架可以捕获无线介质的多功能性。从延迟分布获得分析延迟界限,并将其与细粒度的模拟结果进行比较。展示的研究案例表明,根据其设置,TDMA可以提供比CSMA / CA更大或更小的最坏情况范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号