首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on >Building-Environment Control With Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks: Centralized Versus Distributed
【24h】

Building-Environment Control With Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks: Centralized Versus Distributed

机译:通过无线传感器和执行器网络进行建筑环境控制:集中式与分布式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers joint problems of control and communication in wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs) for building-environment control systems. In traditional control systems, centralized control (CC) and distributed control (DC) are two major approaches. However, little work has been done in comparing the two approaches in joint problems of control and communication, particularly in WSANs serving as components of control loops. In this paper, we develop a CC scheme in which control decisions are made based on global information and a DC scheme which enables distributed actuators to make control decisions locally. We also develop methods that enable wireless communications among system devices compatible with the control strategies, and propose a method for reducing packet-loss rate. We compare the two schemes using simulations in many aspects. Simulation results show that the DC can achieve a comparable control performance of the CC, while the DC is more robust against packet loss and has lower computational complexity than the CC. Furthermore, the DC has shorter actuation latency than the CC under certain conditions.
机译:本文考虑了用于建筑环境控制系统的无线传感器和执行器网络(WSAN)中控制和通信的共同问题。在传统控制系统中,集中控制(CC)和分布式控制(DC)是两种主要方法。但是,在控制和通信的联合问题中,尤其是在用作控制环路组件的WSAN中,比较这两种方法的工作很少。在本文中,我们开发了一种CC方案和一种DC方案,其中CC方案基于全局信息做出控制决策,而DC方案使分布式执行器可以在本地做出控制决策。我们还开发了使系统设备之间的无线通信与控制策略兼容的方法,并提出了一种降低丢包率的方法。我们在许多方面使用仿真来比较这两种方案。仿真结果表明,DC可以实现与CC相当的控制性能,而DC则比CC具有更强大的抗丢包能力和更低的计算复杂度。此外,在某些条件下,DC的致动等待时间比CC短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号