首页> 外文期刊>Indian Growth and Development Review >Gender bias in household education expenditure: the case of West Bengal
【24h】

Gender bias in household education expenditure: the case of West Bengal

机译:家庭教育支出中的性别偏见:西孟加拉邦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to detect gender bias in education expenditure on "students", who are children and young adults, in a household in the rural and the urban sectors of West Bengal. Outlay equivalent ratios have been calculated using the Engel curve approach, where the budget share function is log quadratic in income, to identify items relating exclusively to education of school/college going students. Heckman's (1979) two-step procedure is used for estimation to address selection bias The 68th round (July 2011 to June 2012) household level consumption expenditure survey data of the National Sample Survey Organisation have been used for the analysis. Design/methodology/approach - Engel curve approach is used to capture parental preference for student's welfare and to find the existence of male student favouritism in the field of education. In case of exclusive adult goods, the addition of a student will reduce the resource allocated for adult goods leading to negative income effect. If a household favours males over females, then that household is likely to sacrifice more for a male student's education than that for a female student. To address selection bias, Heckman's two-step procedure has been used. Findings - The authors find that not all education items relate exclusively to students of a household. Expenditure on books is not exclusively for students, whereas other educational items, such as stationary and photocopy charges, tuition fees and private coaching fees, are found to be students' items only. Transport cost is found to be an adult good. Further, we find evidence of pro male bias in expenditure on educational items, and the extent of gender bias is more in the urban sectors compared to the rural sectors in West Bengal. Originality/value - The objective of this paper is to identify the educational items exclusively for "students" and to test the difference in the allocation of resources in education, with respect to these items, between a male student and a female student for both sectors in West Bengal, using the outlay equivalent ratios.
机译:目的-本文旨在检测在西孟加拉邦农村和城市家庭的“学生”(儿童和年轻人)的教育支出中的性别偏见。已经使用恩格尔曲线法计算了支出当量比率,其中预算份额函数是收入的对数二次方,以识别与上学/上大学的学生的教育完全相关的项目。使用Heckman(1979)的两步过程进行估计,以解决选择偏倚。使用了国家样本调查组织的第68轮(2011年7月至2012年6月)家庭水平的消费支出调查数据进行了分析。设计/方法/方法-恩格尔曲线方法用于捕获父母对于学生福利的偏好,并发现在教育领域中存在男生偏爱的行为。如果是成人专用商品,增加一名学生将减少分配给成人商品的资源,从而导致负面的收入影响。如果一个家庭偏爱男性而不是女性,那么该家庭可能为男性学生的教育付出的代价要比为女性学生付出的代价更大。为了解决选择偏差,使用了Heckman的两步过程。调查结果-作者发现并非所有的教育项目都只与家庭学生有关。书本上的支出不仅仅用于学生,而其他教育项目(例如文具和影印费,学费和私人教练费)仅是学生的项目。发现运输费用是成人物品。此外,我们发现有证据表明,男性在教育项目支出上存在偏见,与西孟加拉邦的农村地区相比,城市地区的性别偏见程度更大。原创性/价值-本文的目的是确定专门用于“学生”的教育项目,并测试这两个领域的男学生和女学生在教育资源分配方面的差异,就这些项目而言在西孟加拉邦,使用支出当量比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号