...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >'Abraxis Bioscience': Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 21 March 2019 - Case No. C-443/17
【24h】

'Abraxis Bioscience': Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 21 March 2019 - Case No. C-443/17

机译:'abraxis Bioscience':欧洲司法法院的决定2019年3月21日 - 案件号C-443/17

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

1. Article 3(d) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, read in conjunction with Article 1(b) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that the marketing authorisation referred to in Article 3(b) of that regulation, relied on in support of an application for a supplementary protection certificate concerning a new formulation of an old active ingredient, cannot be regarded as being the first marketing authorisation for the product concerned as a medicinal product in the case where that active ingredient has already been the subject of a marketing authorisation as an active ingredient.
机译:1.条例第3(d)条(ec)欧洲议会的第469/2009号和2009年5月6日的理事会关于药品的补充保护证明,与该条例的第1(b)条相结合,必须被解释为意义,即该法规第3(b)条所提到的营销授权依赖于支持有关旧活性成分的新配方的补充保护证书,不能被视为第一个营销授权作为有关产品的产品,即在积极成分已经成为营销授权作为活性成分的主题的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号