...
首页> 外文期刊>IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems >Comparative Study of Speaker Identification Methods: dPLRM, SVM and GMM
【24h】

Comparative Study of Speaker Identification Methods: dPLRM, SVM and GMM

机译:说话人识别方法:dPLRM,SVM和GMM的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A comparison of performances is made of three text-independent speaker identification methods based on dual Penalized Logistic Regression Machine (dPLRM), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) with experiments by 10 male speakers. The methods are compared for the speech data which were collected over the period of 13 months in 6 utterance-sessions of which the earlier 3 sessions were for obtaining training data of 12 seconds' utterances. Comparisons are made with the Mel-frequency cepstrum (MFC) data versus the log-power spectrum data and also with training data in a single session versus in plural ones. It is shown that dPLRM with the log-power spectrum data is competitive with SVM and GMM methods with MFC data, when trained for the combined data collected in the earlier three sessions. dPLRM outperforms GMM method especially as the amount of training data becomes smaller. Some of these findings have been already reported in [l]-[3].
机译:比较了基于双重惩罚逻辑回归机(dPLRM),支持向量机(SVM)和高斯混合模型(GMM)的三种与文本无关的说话人识别方法,并以10位男性说话人进行了实验。比较了这些方法的语音数据,这些语音数据是在6个月的会话中从13个月的时间中收集的,其中较早的3个会话用于获得12秒钟的语音训练数据。将梅尔频率倒谱(MFC)数据与对数功率谱数据进行比较,并在单个会话中将训练数据与多个会话中的训练数据进行比较。结果表明,当对前三个会话中收集的组合数据进行训练时,具有对数功率谱数据的dPLRM与具有MFC数据的SVM和GMM方法相比具有竞争优势。 dPLRM优于GMM方法,尤其是在训练数据量变小时。这些发现中的一些已经在[1]-[3]中报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号